05-02-2006 02:11 AM - edited 03-03-2019 12:34 PM
I have a test lab set up and trying to redistribute a route into BGP using a route map, I have AS100 containing two routers r1 & r2, there is also EIGRP running between these two routers. I have created a loopback address of 10.10.10.1/32 on r2, when I do a show ip route on r2 I can see the route being advertised via BGP with an origin of ? however on r1 I don not see any routes being propagated via BGP, I see the routers have a BGP peering session however no routes. Synchronization is off. Can anyone offer some advice?
05-02-2006 04:05 AM
The prefix is probably filtered out by the route-map. Could you post the route-map and the BGP config.
Thanks,
05-02-2006 05:06 PM
First try to see if the router is sending the routes out
on r2:
show ip bgp neighor x.x.x.x advertised-routes
if it is :
on r1: show ip bgp neighbor x.x.x.x routes
There are many reasons for why a route is not advertised or not installed in the BGP table or not installed in the routing table.
Let us know,
Vlad
05-02-2006 05:58 PM
I think it would be relevant to see if the prefix is being locally originated before looking at whether it is being advertised to the peer or not.
show ip bgp 10.10.10.1 would tell you just that. But as I posted before I highly suspect that the issue might be with the route being filtered out while redistributing it into BGP.
Hope this helps,
05-03-2006 08:30 AM
Hello, I thought he had said that he saw the route as BGP on his routing table.
vlad
05-03-2006 11:52 AM
Vladimir,
You are totally correct. According to the original post the bgp prefix is seen with an origin of incomplete.
I would still like to see the "show ip bgp 10.10.10.1" from both r1 and r2 to find out what is going on with that prefix.
Thanks,
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: