cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1044
Views
0
Helpful
7
Replies

Cisco 7201: PPTP Passthrough support

Hi everyone,

I have an issue with PPTP tunnels behind a 7201 router which does NAT Overloading for inside LAN hosts.

Users in LAN are unable to establish outgoing PPTP connections to some outside Internet servers.

I had this network up and running with older Cisco3745 with c3745-adventerprisek9-mz.124-12.bin

And I didn't have such issues. No specific NAT configuration were exist, just a ACL with NAT overload statement for outside interface.

Now I have Cisco 7201 router with c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T3.bin IOS image.

I've been wondering if PPTP Passthrough feature is supported in this IOS version\platform.

If yes, I would like to know how to enable it, cause on 3745 I did't make any specific tuning to NAT overloading to have PPTP work.

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

7 Replies 7

Phillip Remaker
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

PPTP has to forward both TCP protocol 1723 and GRE (IP protocol 43) - watch out if you have NAT at both sides of the link.

See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949c0.shtml

Hi Phillip,

Thanks for your feedback, but in my case I have NAT only on my side of the link.

I think the issue is related to NAT inside VRF.

More on that here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3296167#3296167

Please, someone close\delete this discussion in WAN R&S section, cause I've opened

another one in Security\Firewalling which is more correct place for it. Thanks.

Does anyone have an idea how to fix this issue? Thanks.

Is the 7201 doing anything like MPLS-VPN?  If so, perhaps CSCtj61284 or CSCsg70334 might apply?  Need more details about your situation to comment usefully.

Hi Phillip,

Yes, I use VRF-Lite to isolate this network segment from global routing table.

My config looks like this:

interface GigabitEthernet0/0.13
encapsulation dot1Q 13
ip vrf forwarding Internet

ip address y.y.y.1 255.255.255.224 secondary

ip address y.y.y.2 255.255.255.224 secondary
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.17
encapsulation dot1Q 17
ip vrf forwarding Internet
ip address z.z.z.z 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside

!

ip nat pool POOL_1 y.y.y.1 y.y.y.1 netmask 255.255.255.224

ip nat pool POOL_2 y.y.y.2 y.y.y.2 netmask 255.255.255.224
ip nat inside source list NAT_1 pool POOL_1 vrf Internet overload

ip nat inside source list NAT_2 pool POOL_2 vrf Internet overload

With NAT overload config I have an issue with PPTP tunnels: users are unable to create tunnels to VPN server located somewhere on the Internet.

If I change NAT config to static 1:1 configuration for some selected LAN hosts - the problem disappears.

Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks.

Hi Phillip,

Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

Personally, I am out of ideas.  Your best course of action at this point is to open a TAC case.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card