05-09-2014 10:03 AM - edited 03-04-2019 10:57 PM
Hello,
I would like you to help me with the following issue. I need to connect the following in the router 2911:
gigaEthernet 0/1.20
encapsulation dot1q 20
192.168.120.0 255.255.255.0
to:
gigaEthernet 0/0.90
encapsulation dot1q 90
11.0.12.2 255.255.255.252
Also:
gigaEthernet 0/1.21
encapsulation dot1q 21
192.168.180.0 255.255.255.0
to:
gigaEthernet 0/0.91
encapsulation dot1q 91
11.0.12.6 255.255.255.252
The next hop for 11.0.12.2 is 11.0.12.1 and the next hop for 11.0.12.6 is 11.0.12.5
So, I want to connect the Subnetworks 192.168.120. 0 and 192.168.180.0 to remote host 172.18.70.5, but the subnetwork 192.168.120.0 through 11.0.12.1, and the subnetwork 192.168.180.0 through 11.0.12.5.
I have tried the following:
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.120.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.180.0 0.0.0.255 any
!
route-map XXXX permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 11.0.12.1
!
route-map YYYY permit 20
match ip address 102
set ip next-hop 11.0.12.5
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 192.168.120.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map XXXX
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.21
encapsulation dot1Q 21
ip address 192.168.180.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map YYYY
!
!
ip route 11.0.12.0 255.255.255.252 GigabitEthernet0/0.80
ip route 11.0.12.4 255.255.255.252 GigabitEthernet0/0.81
ip route 192.168.120.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet0/1.20
ip route 192.168.180.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet0/1.21
!
But it is not routing. So I added the ip route to the network 172.18.70.0 with a next hop and it routes, but I want it to be separated by subred:
Please could you give me some advice to solve this?
I have also thought to use "tag" in route-map in this way:
route-map XXXX permit 10
match ip address 101
set tag 20
!
route-map YYYY permit 20
match ip address 102
set tag 30
!
ip route 172.18.70.0 255.255.255.0 11.0.15.1 tag 20 ( so that it be used only for subnetwork 192.168.120.0)
ip route 172.18.70.0 255.255.255.0 11.0.15.5 tag 30 ( so that it be used only for subnetwork 192.168.180.0)
What do you think, could this works?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Sandro
05-09-2014 12:15 PM
05-11-2014 10:08 AM
Hello davrojas,
I have not used debug yet. But, what do you think? What should I use in route map: set ip next hop or tag.
If I use "set ip next hop", ip route 172.18.70.0 ..... it is not necessary, isn't it?
If I use "tag" in route map and I add it to "ip route 172.18.70.0 ..", so should it work?
Thanks for your answers,
07-24-2015 03:37 PM
This discussion has been reposted from Top Contributors to the WAN, Routing and Switching community.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide