04-12-2012 05:05 PM - edited 03-04-2019 04:00 PM
Hi Guys,
Is it normal to have the odd timeouts when doing a continous ping from my home to a public ip across the internet or is this a problem?
Any help will be greatly apprecited.
Thanks,
Lake
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-12-2012 06:15 PM
Hello,
It is better next time to paste the utput you see for us to clearly see the problem. Do you sing pings missed or RTT very high?
Nik
04-12-2012 06:46 PM
Some pings being dropped - not the best sign - though ping might not be actually droppec- but delayed.
I mean that by default ping is using default Wait timeout for a ping response before declaring it as missed. So you can change that timeout to a higher value (-w on Windows or use context help of your ping command as it may be different depending on OS) and see if pings really missed or just arriving later.
If they missed - smth happening on the path. Again - that can be normal if provider is rate-limiting your channel to specific rate or a sign of bad link/HW.
There can be really many apsects of that - and detailed analysis needed even to say if that is fine or a problem.
Nik
04-12-2012 06:15 PM
Hello,
It is better next time to paste the utput you see for us to clearly see the problem. Do you sing pings missed or RTT very high?
Nik
04-12-2012 06:34 PM
I mean ping missed. I have an output but there is no timeout here. The RTT looks good yet there are the odd missed ping.
Thanks,
Lake
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55
04-12-2012 06:46 PM
Some pings being dropped - not the best sign - though ping might not be actually droppec- but delayed.
I mean that by default ping is using default Wait timeout for a ping response before declaring it as missed. So you can change that timeout to a higher value (-w on Windows or use context help of your ping command as it may be different depending on OS) and see if pings really missed or just arriving later.
If they missed - smth happening on the path. Again - that can be normal if provider is rate-limiting your channel to specific rate or a sign of bad link/HW.
There can be really many apsects of that - and detailed analysis needed even to say if that is fine or a problem.
Nik
04-12-2012 07:01 PM
Thanks guys.
Regards,
Lake
04-12-2012 08:10 PM
Test
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide