cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Announcements
Join Customer Connection to register!
348
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies
Lost & Found
Beginner

DMVPN PHASE 3 and IPSEC COMMUNICATION ISSUE?

Hi ALL, I studying DMVPN phase 3 and would like to ask if you can answer some of my question and issue that I'm working on right now.

 

image.png

Description: From the topology, I have 3 sites A, B and C and all routers are DMVPN configured. From the topology also you can see that Site B and C (spoke-to-spoke) communication is working but Site A & B is not working.

Questions:

  1. In which specific database HUB stores the route information from its spoke routers ? if is based on RIB, FIB or NHRP database ? with this, HUB know where to forward the traffic and also this being use to send a redirect whenever there a better path that spoke could use.
  2. From the topology, Site A has a preferred path from HUB perceptive which is to forward Site A lan network to another PE and not directly to HUB. With this, this affect the spoke-to-spoke communication. Could you give input about this, Does hub needs to have the best path towards to its Peer tunnel to send a redirect (related to #1)?
  3. Can we able to run a spoke-to-spoke test between Site A and Site B using their tunnel interface IP addresses since it is directly connected and not being manipulated?

 

example:

Site A - R2 (tunnel 0 - 192.168.1.10/24)

Site B - R (tunnel 0 - 192.168.1.20/24)

 

SiteA# ping 192.168.1.20 source 192.168.1.10

Result: Working

SiteA# trace 192.168.1.20 source 192.168.1.10

Result: 2hops away - HUB -> SITEB ROUTER

 

Same result with Siteb to Sitea ping and trace.

 

4. All spoke routers have IPSEC profile configured but Site A and Site B spoke-to-spoke communication unable to fully form phase2 IPSEC. All policies, attributes are the same since we cannot form an adjacency with hub if there something missing... So believe this is due to the fact we cannot form a spoke-to-spoke communication because of the preferred path? BTW im using the tunnel interfaces to test (see #3 sample).

 

Debug Output from SITEA router2:

46 CEST: ISAKMP-PAK: (15727):received packet from 222.1.1.1 dport 500 sport 500 INTERNET (R) QM_IDLE

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):set new node 1832717634 to QM_IDLE

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):processing HASH payload. message ID = 1832717634

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):processing SA payload. message ID = 1832717634

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):Checking IPSec proposal 1

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):transform 1, ESP_AES

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): attributes in transform:

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): encaps is 2 (Transport)

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): SA life type in seconds

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): SA life duration (basic) of 3600

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): SA life type in kilobytes

46 CEST: ISAKMP: SA life duration (VPI) of 0x0 0x46 0x50 0x0

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): authenticator is HMAC-SHA

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727): key length is 256

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):atts are acceptable.

46 CEST: IPSEC(ipsec_process_proposal): peer address 222.1.1.1 not found

46 CEST: ISAKMP-ERROR: (15727):IPSec policy invalidated proposal with error 64

46 CEST: ISAKMP-ERROR: (15727):phase 2 SA policy not acceptable! (local 59.46.230.254 remote 222.1.1.1)

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):set new node 3820497615 to QM_IDLE

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):Sending NOTIFY PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN protocol 3

spi 140005555332392, message ID = 3820497615

46 CEST: ISAKMP-PAK: (15727):sending packet to 222.1.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.

46 CEST: ISAKMP: (15727):purging node 3820497615

46 CEST: ISAKMP-ERROR: (15727):deleting node 1832717634 error TRUE reason "QM rejected"

 

Can we have technical inputs about this?

 

46 CEST: IPSEC(ipsec_process_proposal): peer address 222.1.1.1 not found

46 CEST: ISAKMP-ERROR: (15727):IPSec policy invalidated proposal with error 64

46 CEST: ISAKMP-ERROR: (15727):phase 2 SA policy not acceptable! (local 59.46.230.254 remote 222.1.1.1)

 

Thank you

2 REPLIES 2
asiahmakoun
Beginner

Good morning,

I have a question regarding 3650/3850 layer 3 switches if I they can support secure tunnel IPsec/GRE  for DMVPN ?

We are enabling bunch of our developers to be able connect to our data centers from home but we don't have enough routers but we have bunch of layer 3 3650 and 3850 switches.

Thanks

Aref

Hello,

 

I don't think IPSec VPNs are supported on the 3850.

 

Check the data sheet:

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3850-series-switches/datasheet_c78-720918.html