cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
620
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

EIGRP 200 EIGRP 201

MARCELO MATURO
Level 1
Level 1

There are 2 autonomous system, 200 and 201, configured over the sames interfaces. We need that the networks conected in COREA , DISTA, COREB and DISTB would be seen trhough eigrp 201 ( the red one lines). 

The problem is with networks conected in DISTA and DISTB. The routers COREA and COREB doesn´t know this ones on eigrp 201, only on eigrp 200.

In topology command they show FD is 4294967295 ( unrecheable).

I don´t know what is wrong.

Thanks

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

I think you are over-thinking it.  :-)

I don't see any benefit.

I would drop back to using a single EIGRP routing process.

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Philip D'Ath
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Yucky,

You could redistribute EIGRP 200 into 201.

But the bigger question is why have two different EIGRP processes?

Our idea was that TA y TB see the networks originated in COREA, DISTA, COREB, DISTB  by eigrp200 and this 4 routers interchange routes by eigrp 201. This four routers are conecting services ( A and B are diferents sites). TA and TB are conecting users, that consumes the services.

The idea was then, that eigrp 201 routes for services and eigrp 200 propagates this routes to clients.

Thanks

I think you are over-thinking it.  :-)

I don't see any benefit.

I would drop back to using a single EIGRP routing process.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card