cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3199
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

EIGRP and DMVPN config

Hulk8647
Level 1
Level 1

Hello guys,

I want to prepare for a new deployment for my DMVPN and EIGRP hub. Currently, we only have 1 hub for all EIGRP and DMVPN spokes. We're preparing to get 2 new Cisco routers for redundancy. My current config on the hub and spokes is as follows:

HUB

interface Tunnel0
 description DMVPN
 ip address 10.255.14.1 255.255.254.0
 no ip redirects
 ip mtu 1400
 ip wccp 62 redirect in
 ip flow monitor NTAmonitor input
 ip nhrp authentication enlivant
 ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
 ip nhrp network-id 1
 ip nhrp holdtime 300
 ip nhrp registration no-unique
 ip nhrp redirect
 ip summary-address eigrp 2 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
 keepalive 5 3
 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
 tunnel mode gre multipoint
 tunnel key 1
 tunnel vrf outside
 tunnel protection ipsec profile AES-SHA shared
end

sh run sec eigrp
 ip summary-address eigrp 2 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
router eigrp 2
 network 0.0.0.0
 passive-interface default
 no passive-interface Tunnel0
 no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10

SPOKE

interface Tunnel0
 description DMVPN
 ip address 10.255.14.162 255.255.254.0
 no ip redirects
 ip mtu 1400
 ip nhrp authentication enlivant
 ip nhrp map 10.255.14.1 1.1.1.1
 ip nhrp map multicast 1.1.1.1
 ip nhrp network-id 1
 ip nhrp holdtime 300
 ip nhrp nhs 10.255.14.1
 ip nhrp redirect
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
 keepalive 5 3
 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0/1
 tunnel mode gre multipoint
 tunnel key 1
 tunnel protection ipsec profile AES-SHA shared
 ip virtual-reassembly
end

sh run | sec eigrp
router eigrp 2
 distribute-list prefix BLOCK-EIGRP-DEFAULT in
 network 10.0.0.0
 passive-interface default
 no passive-interface Tunnel0
 eigrp stub connected

netmap.png

 

Since I'm adding a redundant router, how should I configure my HUB and SPOKES to ensure redundancy and load balancing?

 

Thank you

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hello,

Oh - I apologize. I did not know that the document I've referenced was under tighter access control. I think it is in error, but I will need to check this internally.

Either way, I believe this is an older revision of the document that should still be freely accessible:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/3/9/5/26593-DMVPNbk.pdf

Can you perhaps try this one?

Best regards,
Peter

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

Peter Paluch
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hello,

This might not be an entirely straightforward answer, but I would encourage you to read through this very informative Scalable DMVPN Design and Implementation Guide:

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/security/dynamic-multipoint-vpn-dmvpn/dmvpn_design_guide.pdf

It is admittedly long, but it explains a lot, and provides an overview of how to approach the same problem from multiple ends, depending on what might suit you better.

Feel welcome to ask further!

Best regards,
Peter

I can't access the link

Hello,

Oh - I apologize. I did not know that the document I've referenced was under tighter access control. I think it is in error, but I will need to check this internally.

Either way, I believe this is an older revision of the document that should still be freely accessible:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/3/9/5/26593-DMVPNbk.pdf

Can you perhaps try this one?

Best regards,
Peter

thanks, that works
Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card