05-14-2016 10:49 PM - edited 03-05-2019 04:01 AM
Hello guys!
i wanted to ask if we combine IP SLA with object tracking and then link it to a route (default) doesnt it accomplishes the same thing as the first hop redundancy protocols does?
or its switching the router vs switching the route ?
i am getting confuse at it please help if you can i am currently studying and its stuck in my mind.
cheers
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-15-2016 08:03 AM
Hello.
If you replace FHRP with ip_sla, this would move point of decision from router to end-host. It may be desirable in some circumstances, but having number of end-hosts, makes the design non-scalable.
Also if you track just a reachability of a router, this does not guarantee, that the router will be able to forward the traffic properly (with FHRP, router may decrease priority signalling to a peer, that something is wrong).
05-15-2016 08:03 AM
Hello.
If you replace FHRP with ip_sla, this would move point of decision from router to end-host. It may be desirable in some circumstances, but having number of end-hosts, makes the design non-scalable.
Also if you track just a reachability of a router, this does not guarantee, that the router will be able to forward the traffic properly (with FHRP, router may decrease priority signalling to a peer, that something is wrong).
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide