cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1186
Views
5
Helpful
2
Replies

ASR9010, cannot configure static route from VRF default to interface that belongs to another VRF

Alex Zhang
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

 

I have an asr9010 running IOS-XR 6.2.3 and configured 2 VRFs on it. 

I got an error when configuring static route from default and VRF-01 to sub-interface belongs to VRF-02.

Below is the configuration, and the last few rows are the error message.

The weird thing is that the static routes from default to VRF-01, VRF-01 to default, VRF-02 to VRF-01, and VRF-02 to default are all configured successfully.


interface Bundle-Ether1.1
bandwidth 40000000
ipv4 address 192.168.0.0/31
ipv4 unreachables disable
flow ipv4 monitor asr9010 sampler asr9010 ingress
encapsulation dot1q 1
!
interface Bundle-Ether1.2
bandwidth 40000000
vrf VRF-01
ipv4 address 192.168.0.2/31
ipv4 unreachables disable
flow ipv4 monitor asr9010 sampler asr9010 ingress
encapsulation dot1q 2
!
interface Bundle-Ether1.3
bandwidth 40000000
vrf VRF-02
ipv4 address 192.168.0.4/31
ipv4 unreachables disable
flow ipv4 monitor asr9010 sampler asr9010 ingress
encapsulation dot1q 3
!

router static
add ipv4 un
10.0.0.0/16 null 0 190
10.1.0.0/16 vrf VRF-01 be1.2 192.168.0.3
10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5

vrf VRF-01
add ipv4 un
10.0.0.0/16 vrf default be1.1 192.168.0.1
10.1.0.0/16 null 0 190
10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5

vrf VRF-02
add ipv4 un
10.0.0.0/16 vrf default be1.1 192.168.0.1
10.1.0.0/16 vrf VRF-01 be1.2 192.168.0.3
10.2.0.0/16 null 0 190

########## ERROR MESSAGE ##############

# sho confi fail
router static
address-family ipv4 unicast
10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5
!!% 'ip-static' detected the 'warning' condition 'Interface is already configured on another VRF'
!
!

 

Comments: 

I'm now configured those 2 issue routes without indicated the interface. This workaround works, but package loss is very high.

router static
  add ipv4 un
    10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5

vrf VRF-01
  add ipv4 un
    10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5

2 Replies 2

Alex Zhang
Level 1
Level 1

Comments: 

I'm now configured those 2 issue routes without indicated the interface. This workaround works, but package loss is very high.

router static
  add ipv4 un
    10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5

vrf VRF-01
  add ipv4 un
    10.2.0.0/16 vrf VRF-02 be1.3 192.168.0.5

Hello,

 

check if the bug below applies:

 

fail to add static route with certain number of sub bundle interface
CSCus84992
Description
Issue seen only on one router and for particular bundle interface

Symptom:
static route is failing for a particular sub bundle interface

Conditions:
trying to add a static route using a bundle-sub interface as the outgoing interface

Workaround:
Two different workarounds

1) process restart ipv4_static

2) create a new subinterface on the bundle and use this as the outgoing interface.

Product: (1)
Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Innovations in Cisco Full Stack Observability - A new webinar from Cisco