01-21-2011 07:50 PM - edited 03-04-2019 11:10 AM
I was wondering what configuration is necessary to match an ATM interface to a T1/E1 or a Serial Interface to a T1/E1. I know for sure ATM 0/0/0 is indeed T1 0/0/0 in this case, but what commands can be used to confirm this? Is it possible that say T1 0/0/1 could be associated with ATM0/0/0. I have checked the show run interface commands for both the controller and ATM interface and don't see how they are configured to be connected.
ATM0/0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
T1 0/0/0 is up.
Applique type is Channelized T1
Cablelength is long 0db
Description: AT&T ID*********************** : LEC ID **********************
No alarms detected.
alarm-trigger is not set
Soaking time: 3, Clearance time: 10
AIS State:Clear LOS State:Clear LOF State:Clear
Version info Firmware: 20071011, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0
Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Clock Source is Line.
CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware is 320.
Data in current interval (870 seconds elapsed):
0 Line Code Violations,0 Path Code Violations
0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Data in Interval 1:
0 Line Code Violations,0 Path Code Violations
0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Data in Interval 2:
0 Line Code Violations,0 Path Code Violations
0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Data in Interval 3:
0 Line Code Violations,0 Path Code Violations
0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Thanks,
Dan
01-21-2011 10:01 PM
Daniel.Mckibbin1 wrote:
I was wondering what configuration is necessary to match an ATM interface to a T1/E1 or a Serial Interface to a T1/E1. I know for sure ATM 0/0/0 is indeed T1 0/0/0 in this case, but what commands can be used to confirm this? Is it possible that say T1 0/0/1 could be associated with ATM0/0/0. I have checked the show run interface commands for both the controller and ATM interface and don't see how they are configured to be connected.
IOS figures out it needs a serial interface for a T1 when you configure the channel-group and the interface numbering for the serial interface is derived from the slot/port number of the T1 and the channel-group number you used, e.g.
!
controller T1 0/0/0
framing ...
line code ...
channel-group 0 timeslots 1-8 speed 64
channel-group 2 timeslots 9-16 speed 64
!
interface Serial 0/0/0:0
...
!
interface Serial 0/0/0:2
...
!
If you put a PRI group there instead you get Serial0/0/0:23 because that is the D channel.
I'm not familiar with ATM but the same scheme should apply.
01-22-2011 09:37 AM
Margalla Thanks,
So there is no way that say Serial 0/0/1 can be derived from T1 0/0/0 correct? Because these controller WIC's are physical. the Serial Interfaces derived are virtual correct? I see this remote all the time, but I don't see the physical cabling on the devices. What's the point of mapping a Controller to a different interface? I've seen devices where a show ip int brief lists say one or two gig connections, but when you issue a show controllers there a multiple controllers being used on the device.
02-03-2011 10:11 PM
that is because most if not all interfaces have a controller..if you waht to see the controller of an interface isse the command sh controller [interface name]
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide