cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1353
Views
40
Helpful
15
Replies

Multicast between Old catalyst 6509 and new Nexus OS

sanchezeldorado
Level 1
Level 1

Hello.

 

I'm pretty new to multicast, but I've been thrown into a pretty big network that recently replaced a pair of old catalyst switches with a pair of nexus switches using a VPC and I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple. Through a lot of time spent with cisco, we found that the VPC isn't supported with multicast, so the proposed solution was to create routed layer 3 ports on the nexus and connect those to our core Catalyst 6509 switch for multicast only. All of our typical traffic uses the VPC and a switchport trunk. Multicast worked fine before swapping out the switches, so I'm focusing mostly on the connection between these devices to find the problem. For the purposes of this question, I'm focusing on a single Nexus switch and my core 6509. To add to the fun, all of the multicast is within a vrf called Manufacturing. 

 

First the facts.

Multicast group: 239.255.255.250

Multicast Server(source): 10.180.4.48

Server comes into the core 6509 on vlan 643 (Not the same subnet as the server). 

Multicast traffic should leave the core on port Te2/3/8 (10.180.254.53).

Multicast traffic should arrive on the nexus switch on port Eth4 (10.180.254.54)

Multicast traffic goes out VLANs 208, 221, and 503

 

 

Core interface config:

interface TenGigabitEthernet2/3/8
description Multicast Link to 10.180.1.105 Eth1/4
no switchport
ip vrf forwarding Manufacturing
ip address 10.180.254.53 255.255.255.252
ip pim sparse-mode
end

 

Nexus interface config:

interface Ethernet1/4
description L3 P2P to Core 2/3/8
no switchport
vrf member Manufacturing
no ip redirects
ip address 10.180.254.54/30
no ipv6 redirects
ip pim sparse-mode

 

mroute table on the core:

show ip mroute vrf Manufacturing 239.255.255.250 10.180.4.48
(10.180.4.48, 239.255.255.250), 01:12:46/00:03:26, flags: LJT
Incoming interface: Vlan643, RPF nbr 10.180.126.10, Partial-SC
Outgoing interface list:
TenGigabitEthernet2/3/8, Forward/Sparse, 01:12:39/00:02:54, H
Vlan844, Forward/Sparse, 01:12:46/00:02:06, H

 

You can see that there is traffic coming into the core with the following command, and I can see it incrementing if I run it more than once.

show ip mroute vrf Manufacturing 239.255.255.250 count

Group: 239.255.255.250, Source count: 10, Packets forwarded: 68, Packets received: 68
RP-tree: Forwarding: 0/0/0/0, Other: 0/0/0
Source: 10.180.4.48/32, Forwarding: 68/1/124/0, Other: 68/0/0

 

 

Below you can see the mroute table on the nexus. It only has the (*,G). You can also see that the count is stuck at 3 and doesn't move. 

 

show ip mroute 239.255.255.250 detail vrf Manufacturing

(*, 239.255.255.250/32), uptime: 5w3d, igmp(3) ip(0) pim(0)
RPF-Source: 10.180.250.1 [0/1]
Data Created: No
Locally joined
VPC Flags
RPF-Source Forwarder
Stats: 8528/3995003 [Packets/Bytes], 0.000 bps
Stats: Inactive Flow
Incoming interface: Ethernet1/4, RPF nbr: 10.180.254.53
Outgoing interface list: (count: 3) (bridge-only: 0)
Vlan503, uptime: 5w3d, igmp (vpc-svi)
Vlan208, uptime: 5w3d, igmp (vpc-svi)
Vlan221, uptime: 5w3d, igmp (vpc-svi)

 

 

If I ping from the core to the multicast ip, the nexus responds:

 

ping vrf Manufacturing 239.255.255.250
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 239.255.255.250, timeout is 2 seconds:

Reply to request 0 from 10.180.254.54, 28 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.2.1, 56 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.254.54, 48 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.44.1, 48 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.254.54, 48 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.126.9, 48 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.254.54, 48 ms
Reply to request 0 from 10.180.250.1, 48 ms

 

 

on the core, if I run a debug ip mpacket detail 239.255.255.250, I see the following two lines every 4-6 seconds which matches the incrementing mroute count. 

 

Jan 8 16:49:00.179: IP(1): MAC sa=1cdf.0f03.b180 (Vlan643)
Jan 8 16:49:00.183: IP(1): IP tos=0xB8, len=124, id=11859, ttl=9, prot=17

 

Any ideas? Or troubleshooting steps to figure this out? I'd be very grateful for any help. I've been working on this for months. 

 

Andy

15 Replies 15

Helllo,

 

thanks for the update. I guess if the conclusion is that these features are not compatible, at least you got an answer...

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card