Multiple Site VPN with EIGRP

Christopher Baker · ‎08-24-2018

I am curious for the best way to approach configuring 4 sites each connected to 2 fully meshed WAN networks (each net delivered as ethernet to the site's gateway router) with all site-to-site traffic being sent over a VPN/IPsec tunnel with EIGRP routing determining best path/failover?

I am trying to avoid creating 6 point-to-point tunnels on each site's router (site A net 1 = A1<>B1, A1<>C1, A1<>D1 / site A net 2 = A2<>B2, A2<>C2, A2<>D2). Without encryption, the setup is easy because each ethernet interface is a "private LAN" so establish EIGRP routing, setup neighbors, and you are good to go. Is there a way to add encryption without having to hardcode each VPN tunnel and use EIGRP for best path?

Georg Pauwen · ‎08-25-2018

Hello,

typically, and in order to avoid having to build multiple static tunnels, DMVPN would be the solution, not sure if you have looked into this already ?

Christopher Baker · ‎08-25-2018

Thank you for your response!

I had looked at that initially, but doesn't that still require a "hub / spoke" type connection? In other words, I have 4 sites and in DMVPN, I would have to configure a "hub" site, correct? Let's call that site A. Behind the scene, it is my understanding that if Site B wants to communicate with Site C, it actually does so via Site A (a transparent type bridge). In other words, if the hub goes down, none of the spokes can communicate with each other. So in this case, if Site A were to fail (or loose connection to the WAN network), Site B would not be able to communicate with Site C. Do you know if this is correct when using DMVPN?

Georg Pauwen · ‎08-26-2018

You are exactly right. DMVPN is a hub/spoke setup. You could configure dual hubs though. The only other way I see (and one that doesn't require multiple tunnels on all routers) is an ISP provided MPLS solution.

Christopher Baker · ‎08-26-2018

I was looking at DMVPN a bit closer and I see a reference to a Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. The impression I am getting is that a "Phase 2" and "Phase 3" solution addresses this "Hub/Spoke" failure issue. Though I can't seem to find information confirming this.

Here is a site I was looking at about the Phases. I am assuming this is really "versions of DMVPN" on not actual phases of DMVPN link creation on the routers.

https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/blogs/vip-perspectives/2017/02/15/dmvpn-the-phases-in-depth