cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Announcements
136
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies
mwannemacher
Beginner

PfR on dual ASR with Dual ISP does not work correctly

hello team,

i am configuring for while with PfR now. i got some policies working, others not. but the all other solution is not working as expected.

i use liveaction to see if there is some better traffic flow but => no. 

 

what i tried to accomblish is WAN outbound and inbound optimization on

first: ASN, second applikation, dependent on packet loss, jitter and delay.... 

so may  curent configuration looks like as follows: 

 

we have dual routers ( ASR 1001) with each connected to two upstream carriers.

we have BGP full table.


pfr master
 policy-rules PFR_Configure
 keepalive 60
 logging
 !
 border 169.254.169.12 key-chain xyz
  interface Port-channel1.992 internal
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2 external
   maximum utilization receive percentage 65
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3 external
   maximum utilization receive percentage 65
 !
 border 169.254.169.11 key-chain xyz
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3 external
   maximum utilization receive percentage 65
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2 external
   maximum utilization receive percentage 65
  interface Port-channel1.992 internal
 !
 learn
  delay
  inside bgp
  traffic-class filter access-list PFR_Prefixes
  expire after time 60
 max prefix total 20000 learn 20000
 max range receive percent 40
 mos threshold 3.06
 mode monitor fast
 periodic 90
 !
!
pfr border
 logging
 local Port-channel1.992
 master 169.254.169.11 key-chain xyz

!
pfr-map PFR_Configure 10
 match pfr learn inside
 set periodic 90
 set mode select-exit good
 set backoff 90 90
 set delay threshold 80
 set mode route control
 set mode monitor fast
 set resolve delay priority 1 variance 10

 

 

but i allways get logging  events telling me not "write" ( what it shall be). so does anyone outhere has a working sample config for this cenario ? 

 

i want to use "inside bgp" or a prefix list both possible since we only have a few /22 to announce. 

 

on the other hand outbound everything shall be loadbalanced based on destination.

0 REPLIES 0