06-13-2017 12:48 PM - edited 03-05-2019 08:42 AM
Hello,
I am stuck over a design for route-distribution in hub. DMVPN overlay routing uses EIGRP 400 terminating at two border routers. Routes from legacy wan are distributed into data-center using bgp 65002 on edge routers and then bgp peered to Nexus switches which are in AS 65111. Should I redistribute EIGRP into BGP using a BGP AS number other than 65111 on border router/keep them in same AS. If other AS number, should both border router in same AS or seperate. I am thinking of doing route-tagging to prevent loops.
I know the question is bit vague but any suggestions / implementation opinions would be highly appreciated.
06-14-2017 05:51 AM
You have a full mesh so I would just stick with 65111 and tag the routes as you suggest.
06-14-2017 09:13 AM
Thank you Philip. Assuming I put both BR into AS65111, I would be doing tagging EIGRP routes being distributed from BR1 into BGP AS65111 and then block them at BR2 and vice-versa. While reading through IWAN discussion forum, they suggested I should not bgp peer BR1 and BR2. If it is so, do I need to put them into different AS numbers? My concern is to not break Pfr while doing any known practices.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide