cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
399
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Redundancy for the Cisco 6500 Router

Mohd faraj
Level 1
Level 1

     Hi every body!

 

  I have 2  WS-C6504-E" as following configuration :-

      


Core-1#show module
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
  1    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3B      
  2   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6748-SFP      
  4   10  WiSM WLAN Service Module               WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9  


Mod  Sub-Module                  Model             
---- --------------------------- ------------------
  1  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3B      
  1  MSFC3 Daughterboard         WS-SUP720         
  2  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC      
  4  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9-D

ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ


Core-2#show module
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model            
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------
  1    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3B     
  2   24  CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6724-SFP     
  3   24  CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6724-SFP      
  4   10  WiSM WLAN Service Module               WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9  


Mod  Sub-Module                  Model             
---- --------------------------- ------------------
  1  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3B      
  1  MSFC3 Daughterboard         WS-SUP720         
  2  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC      
  3  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC     
  4  Centralized Forwarding Card WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9-D

=========================================================

currentily in my network there is no Redundancy as shwon in the attached file (Currnet Design)

I am going to make a new design as shown in the attched file (New Design)

so I need your opinion about the connection and configration between both cores if is L2 or L3 , also between access switch and Core switches

Note :- in the both ISP routers I am using BGP .

I Look forward to your opinion.

Thanks..

2 Replies 2

talmadari
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

looking on your new design I think it will be best for use Layer-3 redundancy between the core switches and the edge routers, for example you can use OSPF and BFD and gain a sub-second fail-over between them.

As for the access layer - does these switches are layer-2? where is the layer-3 for those hosts which connected to those switches?

Hi ,

Regarding  Layer-3 for those hosts , in my plan actually there are aournd 10 VLANs and will be created SVI for each one with GLBP protocol on both core switches ,

between the core switches and the edge routers will be Layer-3 through BGP .

my question which is the best for Layers between  both core switches for connection with each other?

as per this design on the each siwtches there are 2 uplink to both core switch but on of this links will be block  due to STP

Thanks..

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card