08-04-2010 05:38 AM - edited 03-04-2019 09:18 AM
Hi
I added a static route (10.96.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.21.1.8) to one of our LAN sites and then advertised it out via BGP. All sites on the network can now access this new route except for one. Any ideas what the issue could be? See below some tests from various sites
london_01#ping 10.96.22.4 source 10.2.2.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.96.22.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 10.2.2.15
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/13/16 ms
london_01#
leeds_01#ping 10.96.22.4 source 10.10.2.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.96.22.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 10.10.2.15
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/15/16 ms
leeds_01#ping 10.96.22.3 source 10.10.2.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.96.22.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 10.10.2.15
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/14/16 ms
but
kingsgate_01#ping 10.96.22.4 source 10.24.2.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.96.22.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 10.24.2.15
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
kingsgate_01#ping 10.22.2.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.22.2.15, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/12/12 ms
kingsgate_01#ping 10.96.22.3 source 10.24.2.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.96.22.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 10.24.2.15
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
kingsgate_01#traceroute 10.96.22.4
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 10.96.22.4
1 172.23x.xxx.xxx 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
2 81.1xxx.xxx.xxx [AS 64522] 12 msec 8 msec 12 msec
3 172.25x.xxx.xxx [AS 2856] 16 msec 12 msec 16 msec
4 * * *
kingsgate_01#sh ip rou 10.96.22.4
Routing entry for 10.96.0.0/16
Known via "bgp 64528", distance 20, metric 0
Tag 2856, type external
Last update from 172.xxx.xxx.xxx 15:19:45 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 172.xxx.xxx.xxx, from 172.xxx.xxx.xxx, 15:19:45 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 2
Route tag 2856
kingsgate_01#sh ip rou 10.22.1.8
Routing entry for 10.22.0.0/17
Known via "bgp 64528", distance 20, metric 0
Tag 2856, type external
Last update from 172.2xx.xxx.xxx 1d13h ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 172.xxx.xxx.xxx, from 172.xxx.xxx.xxx, 1d13h ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 2
Route tag 2856
kingsgate_01#sh ip rou 10.96.22.3
Routing entry for 10.96.0.0/16
Known via "bgp 64528", distance 20, metric 0
Tag 2856, type external
Last update from 172.xxx.xxx.xxx 15:20:31 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 172.xxx.xxx.xxx, from 172.xxx.xxx.xxx, 15:20:31 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 2
Route tag 2856
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-04-2010 06:58 AM
Hi,
isn't it possible the remote site doesn't know a route back to kingsgate_01?
Have you tried to traceroute from 10.96.22.4 to 10.24.2.15?
HTH,
Milan
08-04-2010 06:58 AM
Hi,
isn't it possible the remote site doesn't know a route back to kingsgate_01?
Have you tried to traceroute from 10.96.22.4 to 10.24.2.15?
HTH,
Milan
08-04-2010 07:32 AM
10.96.22.4 didn't know how to get back to 10.24.2.15. Our firewall has now been amended
Thanks for the memory jog!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide