12-13-2010 08:22 PM - edited 03-04-2019 10:46 AM
hi all,
we have a Cisco 1841 router and checked something an unnusual (never seen before) routing table having L - local routes. please advise if this an IOS bug or same as C - connected local routes.
1841#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, 1841 Software (C1841-IPBASE-M), Version 15.0(1)M3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Sun 18-Jul-10 01:16 by prod_rel_team
1841#sh ip ro
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route
Gateway of last resort is 203.120.215.XX to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 203.120.215.XX
203.120.202.YY/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 203.120.202.YY/27 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
L 203.120.202.YY/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
203.120.215.XX/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 203.120.215.XX/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 203.120.215.XX/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
1841#sh ip int bri
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 203.120.215.XX YES manual up up
FastEthernet0/1 203.120.202.YY YES manual up up
12-13-2010 09:15 PM
johnlloyd_13 wrote:
hi all,
we have a Cisco 1841 router and checked something an unnusual (never seen before) routing table having L - local routes. please advise if this an IOS bug or same as C - connected local routes.
1841#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, 1841 Software (C1841-IPBASE-M), Version 15.0(1)M3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Sun 18-Jul-10 01:16 by prod_rel_team1841#sh ip ro
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated routeGateway of last resort is 203.120.215.XX to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 203.120.215.XX
203.120.202.YY/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 203.120.202.YY/27 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
L 203.120.202.YY/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
203.120.215.XX/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 203.120.215.XX/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 203.120.215.XX/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
1841#sh ip int bri
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 203.120.215.XX YES manual up up
FastEthernet0/1 203.120.202.YY YES manual up up
This is not a bug. This was introduced with support for MTR (Multi Topology Routing) and should be there in all IOS versions that support MTR.
Atif
12-13-2010 10:07 PM
hi atif,
thanks for your feedback! any links or documentation to support this?
12-13-2010 10:27 PM
johnlloyd_13 wrote:
hi atif,
thanks for your feedback! any links or documentation to support this?
I know this based on some research I did on this a while back. I do not have any public documentation pointers unfortunately. Please consider opening a TAC case if you need that.
Atif
12-13-2010 11:17 PM
hi atif,
i found some Cisco documentation regarding MTR. but this router isn't running VRF. it is only a stub router connected to a single ISP.
12-13-2010 11:24 PM
johnlloyd_13 wrote:
hi atif,
i found some Cisco documentation regarding MTR. but this router isn't running VRF. it is only a stub router connected to a single ISP.
Hello John,
MTR and VRFs are not directly related so I am not sure what is your concern. That being said the presence of the L - Local routes are not a point of concern. I was just mentioning that they became visible as part of a code change done to support MTR so whichever IOS version supports MTR, it will have these routes visible in the output of the show ip route command. These were always there in the backend to facilitate the CEF receive entries, the difference is that now they are actually visible. Rest assured this is not a bug.
Atif
12-14-2010 03:21 AM
Hi John,
Pls go thro following Link for MTR documentation
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mtr/configuration/guide/12_2sr/mtr_12_2sr_book.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mtr/configuration/guide/12_2sr/mtr_12_sr_book.html
Regards,
Srinadh.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide