cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1077
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Simple network architecture for redundant switches and firewalls?

jimmyc_2
Level 1
Level 1

We'll be building a small remote site that will use two Windows 2008 servers.  We would like redundancy in firewalls, IPS's and switches.   Is it better to buy stand-alone ASA 5510s (with embedded IPS's) and 2960s, or is it a better option to buy a  Cat 6000 with FW modules.  We'll have several internet IP addresses available.  I don't know much about Nexus or latest HW options, so perhaps there's options I don't know about.  Thanks

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

The Cat6500 with ASA-SM is far more expensive then standallone devices. If you think about the 5510 and the throughput is enough, then I would use the following equipment:

2* ASA 5515-X-IPS as Active/Standby

2* Cat 3750-X as a stack with redundant power-supplies.

That will give you a maximum of redundancy for an affordable price.

-- 
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

The Cat6500 with ASA-SM is far more expensive then standallone devices. If you think about the 5510 and the throughput is enough, then I would use the following equipment:

2* ASA 5515-X-IPS as Active/Standby

2* Cat 3750-X as a stack with redundant power-supplies.

That will give you a maximum of redundancy for an affordable price.

-- 
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

jimmyc_2
Level 1
Level 1

Thanks.

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card