10-18-2012 01:22 PM - edited 03-04-2019 05:54 PM
We'll be building a small remote site that will use two Windows 2008 servers. We would like redundancy in firewalls, IPS's and switches. Is it better to buy stand-alone ASA 5510s (with embedded IPS's) and 2960s, or is it a better option to buy a Cat 6000 with FW modules. We'll have several internet IP addresses available. I don't know much about Nexus or latest HW options, so perhaps there's options I don't know about. Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-18-2012 01:57 PM
The Cat6500 with ASA-SM is far more expensive then standallone devices. If you think about the 5510 and the throughput is enough, then I would use the following equipment:
2* ASA 5515-X-IPS as Active/Standby
2* Cat 3750-X as a stack with redundant power-supplies.
That will give you a maximum of redundancy for an affordable price.
--
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni
10-18-2012 01:57 PM
The Cat6500 with ASA-SM is far more expensive then standallone devices. If you think about the 5510 and the throughput is enough, then I would use the following equipment:
2* ASA 5515-X-IPS as Active/Standby
2* Cat 3750-X as a stack with redundant power-supplies.
That will give you a maximum of redundancy for an affordable price.
--
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni
10-22-2012 06:25 AM
Thanks.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide