07-06-2018 08:29 PM - edited 03-05-2019 10:44 AM
I set up very simple network. The first link was a point to point link with the address 10.0.0.0/30. I then had a link with 3 devices so used the subnet 10.0.0.8/29. Two routers could then ping the third and the third could ping them, but they couldn't ping each other. I'm sure the answer is very obvious to this question and I know its not best practice, but why didn't this set up work?
I changed the second segment to a 10.0.1.0/24 subnet and it worked fine.
07-06-2018 09:01 PM
Hello
what was the addressing you gave to these rtrs - was the subnet address correct on all three devices - i assume they were connected all via a switch
Also as they were all on the same subnet the rtrs didn’t require a default gateway or default route
res
paul
07-07-2018 11:44 AM
Hi Thank you for the response.
The routers in question are all in the same subnet. Both Routers 3 and 4 can ping router 2. Router 2 can ping 3 and 4.
However, router 3 and 4 cannot ping each other.
Ping from router 3 to 4:
Reply to request 0 from 10.0.0.9 received 12 ms
Reply to request 1 from 10.0.0.9 received 10 ms
Reply to request 2 from 10.0.0.9 received 12 ms
etc....
Ping from router 4 to 3:
....... timed out...
07-07-2018 01:06 AM
Hello,
provide a schematic drawing of what your topology looks like, including what is connected to what, and which IP addresses are used on which links.
07-07-2018 12:41 PM
Hi Thank you for the response. The routers in question are all in the same subnet. Both Routers 3 and 4 can ping router 2. Router 2 can ping 3 and 4. However, router 3 and 4 cannot ping each other. Ping from router 3 to 4: Reply to request 0 from 10.0.0.9 received 12 ms Reply to request 1 from 10.0.0.9 received 10 ms Reply to request 2 from 10.0.0.9 received 12 ms etc.... Ping from router 4 to 3: ....... timed out...
07-07-2018 01:21 PM
Hello,
check the routing tables: R1 only knows network 10.0.0.0/30, and R3 and R4 only know network 10.0.0.8/29. In order for all networks to be reachable, you need to run either a static default route on ech router, or a routing protocol.
So either:
R1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.2
R3
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.9
R4
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.9
or on each router:
router rip
version 2
network 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
07-07-2018 02:42 PM
A default route shouldn't be needed to communicate with a route on the same subnet though correct? The router 10.0.0.9 can ping 10.0.0.9 but not 10.0.0.11 even though they are both connected to the same switch.
07-07-2018 03:33 PM
07-08-2018 02:24 PM
Hello,
post the configurations of your routers...
07-08-2018 03:26 PM
It seems to me that Georg is trying to solve a different problem. He is concerned about Router 1 access to Router 3 and 4. While I agree that this is a valid concern, it is not what the original post is asking about. The question here is why Router 3 and Router 4 can not communicate. To answer this we need more information. We especially need to understand how Routers 2, 3, and 4 are connected. If this turns out to be a Frame Relay connection then it is likely that the issue is that Router 3 does not have a mapping of IP to DLCI for Router 4 (and similarly lacking a mapping on Router 4 for Router 3). If the connection is a switch, then we have a different issue. I agree with Georg that having the config of the routers will be very helpful.
HTH
Rick
07-09-2018 12:29 AM
I agree with Richard. For the sake of verification I recreated your setup in GNS3, and with Ethernet interfaces and IP addresses 10.0.0.9/28, 10.0.0.10/28, and 10.0.0.11/28 configured on the interfaces, every IP address can ping the respective other ones.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: