04-06-2018 08:22 AM - edited 03-05-2019 10:14 AM
Dears,
I have a link of 7 mbps upload and download speed of wireless point to point connection (layer 2) for my branch, when I try to copy 5GB file on that link the link consumption reaches to 100% and the file copying breaks after sometime,
Q1.
Though the link get fully consumed by 5GB transfer still the copying should not fail ??? please correct me if I m not wrong it should keep on copying rather than breaking, so if it breaking this mean the point to point link is instable ??
Q2
Which free tool I can use to proof to ISP that their link is not stable.
Thanks
04-06-2018 12:36 PM
04-06-2018 03:04 PM
Dears,
Do smaller transfers work? If you devices support shaping, try that
yes smaller transfer work 1GB file, I have not done shaping , the link is on switch and the layer 3 interface is on firewall, on switch it is layer 2 trunk.
what bandwidth measurement tool can justify why the transfer is failing ?? IPERF can be helpful here or some other tool as per your experience.
Regards
04-08-2018 05:49 AM
04-11-2018 05:40 AM
Dear
what is your suggestion for the above issue.
thanks
04-11-2018 07:25 AM
04-11-2018 11:01 AM
I think we need to know more about this environment. For example if there is a routing protocol running over this link then the 5G copy using 100% of bandwidth could cause routing protocol packets to be dropped and this could withdraw the routes learned over this link, which could break the copy.
HTH
Rick
04-12-2018 04:08 AM
04-14-2018 03:18 PM
Dears
As mentioned above it is a layer 2 trunk with no routing protocols, so what I understand is that if a 5 GB copy is initiated on 7 Mbps link then it is not always success to have copied every time, it might stop copying due to full bandwidth or interruption or link flutuation
I want a reason why the copy is not completing a visualize proof for the failure which software can help me the best, Iperf can help me to justify why it is failing ??
Thanks
04-16-2018 05:51 AM
04-16-2018 10:02 AM
I understand that it is a layer 2 connection acting as a trunk. But that does not mean that there is no routing protocol. You have not told us much about your environment so we can not be sure. But think about this as a possible situation. Let us think about an environment where there is a client connected on one side which wants to perform a copy from a server on the other side. There may be several vlans on the trunk and one of those vlans is vlan 10. There is a layer 3 device connected on vlan 10 (could be a router, could be a layer 3 switch, might be something else) which provides connectivity for the client. The layer 3 device runs a routing protocol on vlan 10 to learn the subnet where the server is connected on the other side. The client initiates the copy and the copy consumes the bandwidth on the layer 2 link. Routing protocol packets get dropped because of the congestion. When several routing protocol packets are dropped the routing protocol loses the neighbor relationship with its peer on the other side and withdraws the routing entry for the subnet where the server is. This causes the copy to fail.
HTH
Rick
04-20-2018 10:44 PM
Dears
I apologize If any of the sentences is disrespecting you'll in the post,
I have restricted to only 2 vlans and rest all are removed and it is a completely layer 2, I want to justify the client why it is failing how I can ??
thanks
04-24-2018 07:19 AM
We still do not know enough to be able to identify the cause of this issue. I have made a suggestion that there might be some layer 3 protocol traffic (such as a routing protocol) that might be impacted by congestion on the circuit. Larry Sullivan makes a very interesting suggestion that the issue might involve a layer 2 control protocol that controls the wireless circuit that is impacted by congestion. What I think we understand is that there is some device at this site doing a copy. This device is connected to a switch which is connected to a firewall. The firewall is connected over a point to point wireless to some device at the other site which is connected to something (which might be a router or switch) which might be connected to something (might be another switch or might be the other device doing the copy). Any one of those points might be involved in this issue. I would suggest that as the next step in this troubleshooting would be to post the config of the switch and the firewall at this site, In the configs hide sensitive information such as passwords and public IP addresses and indicate which interfaces are for the host doing the copy and which interfaces are used for connection between switch and firewall and firewall and remote site.
HTH
Rick
04-14-2018 06:51 PM - edited 04-14-2018 06:52 PM
So if 1GB works fine, at what point does the 5GB file fail? Does the 1GB max out the speed as well? If so, for how long?
What is the wireless protocol that maintains connectivity between the two sides of these wireless devices? Is the overhead for this protocol segregated from production traffic as it should be (might have to check with provider)?
To prove link stability in general, a simple ping test would due. To prove stability when speed is maxed out, you would have to refer to the previous question about wireless protocol overhead.
Your provider has probably dealt with these types of issues many times and should have a general explanation for you.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide