cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
448
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

XOT: fail to route incoming call with CUD=00

jpmarce
Level 1
Level 1

Hello,

An incoming call received on an x25 serial interface is not routed over XOT as expected. The reason seems to be because the CUD contains a null NLPID i.e. the first byte is =00 in hex. Any other incoming call with a different CUD is routed over XOT. Below are the trace and the router configuration:

1.Here is the debug trace:

Router2#debug x25 int ser 1/6

X.25 packet debugging is on

X.25 debug output restricted to interface Serial1/6

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Serial1/6: X.25 I R1 Call (31) 8 lci 0

*Apr 30 11:49:38: From (9): 120030153 To (2): 44

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Facilities: (4)

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Behavior flags:

*Apr 30 11:49:38: no Reverse charging, no Fast select

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Closed User Group (basic): 00

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Call User Data (16): 0x00000000 (x25-multiprotocol)

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Address map failed

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Serial1/6: X.25 O R1 Clear (5) 8 lci 0

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Cause 0, Diag 68 (DTE originated/Invalid source

address)

*Apr 30 11:49:38: Serial1/6: X.25 I R1 Clear Confirm (3) 8 lci 0

2.Here is the router configuration:

version 12.1

no service single-slot-reload-enable

service pad to-xot

service pad from-xot

service tcp-keepalives-in

service tcp-keepalives-out

service timestamps debug datetime localtime

service timestamps log datetime localtime

no service password-encryption

!

hostname Router2

!

boot system flash slot0:c3620-is-mz.121-5.T

logging buffered 65536 debugging

logging rate-limit console 10 except errors

enable password ......

!

memory-size iomem 15

ip subnet-zero

!

no ip finger

no ip domain-lookup

!

x25 routing

call rsvp-sync

!

source-bridge ring-group 999

dlsw local-peer

dlsw bridge-group 10

interface Ethernet0/0

ip address 172.18.1.32 255.255.255.0

full-duplex

bridge-group 10

!

interface Ethernet0/0

ip address 172.18.1.32 255.255.255.0

full-duplex

bridge-group 10

!

interface Serial1/6

description XM10008

no ip address

encapsulation x25

x25 address 20030055

x25 alias .*

x25 htc 32

x25 win 3

x25 wout 3

x25 accept-reverse

x25 suppress-calling-address

x25 subscribe lc0 two-way

x25 pad-access

lapb T4 5

qllc dlsw vmacaddr 4000.3622.6001 30 partner 4000.4468.0040

!

ip classless

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.18.1.251

ip route 172.18.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.1.223

no ip http server

!

snmp-server community public RO

!

x25 route .* source ^20030055$ substitute-source \0 interface Serial1/6

x25 route .* input-interface Serial1/6 substitute-dest 20030055\0 xot 172.18.1.253 xot-keepalive-period 20 xot-keepalive-tries 3

!

bridge 10 protocol ieee

!

dial-peer cor custom

!

line con 0

exec-timeout 0 0

logging synchronous

login

transport input none

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

Question: what to do to get the incoming call with a CUD=00 to be routed over XOT?

Regards.

4 Replies 4

s.jankowski
Level 4
Level 4

I am not aware of your problem, If a matching route is found, the incoming call is forwarded to the next hop depending on the routing entry. If no match is found, the call is cleared.

For more info : ttp://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t3/x25ca.htm#xtocid

Thanks a lot but I know very well what you are telling and I know also very well how to insert/remove/modify calling adresses as the URL you porived (with a missing 'h' in front) is telling. I already have configured succesfully more that 50 different routers with various xot traffic.

My problem is that there are some very weird things happening that are documented nowhere when using pad, qllc and xot on an x25 interface that I know. I am looking for help.

I have opened a case.

MARCELO MATURO
Level 1
Level 1

The diagnostic 68 indicates invalid facility. The xot insert in the call request paquet the same paramaters configured at the incoming interface

(x25 win 3

x25 wout 3

x25 accept-reverse )

maybe this parameters don´t agree witch the host that receive the call.

Marcelo

Thanks,

I don't know how to close this topic, but I don't need help anymore. I found the solution by opening a service request.

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card