cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Announcements
1406
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies
reheindel
Beginner

Stealthwatch - Local TZ vs UTC

Good morning, we are in the middle of deploying Stealthwatch 7.0

 

I would like to schedule a report - Suspect Long Flows Alarms for example

 

When I view the alarms in the in the Java client - the times reflect local timezone information - yet when the scheduled report is generated - the alarms are all displayed in UTC

 

Has anybody else noticed this - and can this be modified to reflect local time for the alarms on the report?


Thanks in advance for any info

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
brford
Cisco Employee

Thanks for pointing that out.

 

After some research changing the time reflected in Java client reporting does not seem to be configurable. At the time that was developed; normalizing time to UTC was viewed as a feature because it allowed you to compare results from two SMCs quickly.

 

I did bring this to the attention of the team that is developing the new web user interface response management and reporting capability.

Brian Ford | brford@cisco.com | brford@yahoo.com | 51 75 61 6c 69 74 79 20 6d 65 61 6e 73 20 64 6f 69 6e 67 20 69 74 20 72 69 67 68 74 20 77 68 65 6e 20 6e 6f 20 6f 6e 65 20 69 73 20 6c 6f 6f 6b 69 6e 67 2e | Email me when you figure this out.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
brford
Cisco Employee

Thanks for pointing that out.

 

After some research changing the time reflected in Java client reporting does not seem to be configurable. At the time that was developed; normalizing time to UTC was viewed as a feature because it allowed you to compare results from two SMCs quickly.

 

I did bring this to the attention of the team that is developing the new web user interface response management and reporting capability.

Brian Ford | brford@cisco.com | brford@yahoo.com | 51 75 61 6c 69 74 79 20 6d 65 61 6e 73 20 64 6f 69 6e 67 20 69 74 20 72 69 67 68 74 20 77 68 65 6e 20 6e 6f 20 6f 6e 65 20 69 73 20 6c 6f 6f 6b 69 6e 67 2e | Email me when you figure this out.

View solution in original post

Thanks for the reply - I appreciate you digging into it.

 

I did open a TAC case back in June and they indicated similar to what you mentioned - but I had TAC submit an enhancement request as well.


Thanks,

Bob