This document describes a scenario where user wants to implement routing between 2 Site to Site VPN Tunnels.
All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.The VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C are up.User have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command.
How do user enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C.User has been trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of Cisco ASA.
2 spoke networks connected with L2L VPN will communicate with each other:
User need to configure the "same-security-traffic permit intra-interface"
User need to configure the remote networks A and C to the "crypto map x match address <ACL>" ACLs which will enable the traffic to flow from the one L2L VPN to the other L2L VPN
User need to configure appropriate NAT rules for traffic flow.
You need to do NAT0 and VPN rules on each site to allow the traffic.The configurations will look something like below.User already probably have an existing NAT0 configuration and certainly the L2L VPN configuration.
Site Aaccess-list NAT0 remark NAT0 rule for SiteA to SiteC trafficaccess-list NAT0 permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT0access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB remark Interesting traffic for SiteA to SiteCaccess-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
NAT0 = This ACL is to be used in the NAT0 rules that will exempt SiteA to SiteC traffic from NATnat = NAT0 configuration lineL2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB = This ACL in the L2L-VPN configurations defines that the traffic from SiteA LAN to SiteC LAN should use the existing L2L-VPN towards SiteB
Site Baccess-list OUTSIDE-NAT0 remark NAT0 rule for SiteA to SiteC trafficaccess-list OUTSIDE-NAT0 permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0nat (outside) 0 access-list OUTSIDE-NAT0access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA remark Traffic for SiteA to SiteC through existing Tunnel between A-Baccess-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEC remark Traffic for SiteA to SiteC through existing Tunnel between B-Caccess-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEC permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
OUTSIDE-NAT0 = This ACL is used in the NAT0 rules which will exempt SiteA to SiteC traffic from NAT. Here it is attached to the "outside" interface as the traffic will be entering and leaving through that interface at SiteBnat = NAT0 configuration lineL2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEA (and SITEC) = Are the ACLs in the L2L-VPN configurations that defines that the traffic from SiteA LAN to SiteC LAN should use the existing L2L-VPN connections.
Site Caccess-list NAT0 remark NAT0 rule for SiteC to SiteA trafficaccess-list NAT0 permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT0access-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB remark Interesting traffic for SiteC to SiteAaccess-list L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
NAT0 = This ACL is used in the NAT0 rules which will exempt SiteC to SiteA traffic from NAT
nat = NAT0 configuration line
L2L-VPN-CRYPTO-SITEB = This ACL in the L2L-VPN configurations defines the traffic from SiteC LAN to SiteA LAN should use the existing L2L-VPN towards SiteB
I am having a user who is trying to access iSE using an AD account.The account has the proper groups associated with it and I've verified the ISE configuration. How do I view logs of attempted login attempts? Thanks, Phill
Hi, I have two ISE 2.7 Patch 2 virtual devices. I have a test switch with some users and phones on it. My aim is for laptops, desktop and wyse terminal to authenticate using dot1x. The Cisco phone will authentication via mab. The Cisc...
The device requesting the access is going through the proxy. ISE shows the proxy in region A which is our datacenter. That is fine, however it's trying to authorize the device against region A instead of the actual location policy the network device is co...
we have a requirement to allow non corporate devices straight out to the internet, this is to do with ISO27001. So have started to create iPSKs from internal to DMZ no problem, just time consuming creating DNS,DHCP, Zones ect on Firewall and th...
Do the Firepower appliances have the ability to show the L7 apps used by a rule similar to Palo Alto's Usage feature? From what I've found, the only way to see the app used by a rule is to check the event explorer and filter on the rule name. This usually...