by Andrew Mackay, Manager Mobile Solutions, Cisco Systems
In my last post Bringing LTE Indoors, I discussed the compelling need to address LTE coverage indoors to allow service migration off 3G, particularly for Voice. We know there is a variety of options for MNOs to address indoor coverage, either from outside in with more outdoor sites, or from inside with wider use of Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS), repeaters or Smallcells. The “outdoor in” approach would mean even more BTS sites, but site acquisition challenges and build costs generally mean this is no longer an option in urban areas. Addressing coverage from indoors makes sense, but what is the optimal solution?
I’ve heard people talking about a “toolbox” approach to indoor coverage, but which tool is right for which job? There is no point using a 6 inch spanner on a 1/4 inch nut, and it’s the same with providing coverage and capacity you need an optimal cost solution for the size of the indoor hole to fill.
Cisco has worked with many operators on modelling Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for various indoor coverage solutions. The results of one recent study are shown below, comparing Distributed Antenna Systems to Smallcells; either installed by the MNO or by the end-user themselves (DIY).
“5-Year TCO study for various indoor coverage solutions”
Obviously this isn’t an “Apples for Apples” comparison since the capacities are so different. But even if we normalise by the number of design users, Smallcells show clear TCO per user benefit.
“Normalised TCO per user for various indoor coverage solutions”
The other thing I observed in this study was how much the DAS system TCO improved when a larger number of users are required to be served in a location. I therefore extended the study to look at how the DAS vs Smallcell TCO comparison varied for different sized enterprises.
“Comparison of DAS versus Smallcell TCO for various Enterprise sizes”
For small enterprises of <50 people, which represents the majority of businesses, Smallcells are clearly more cost effective. Due to their more modular capacity, re-use of WLAN infrastructure and easier installation Smallcells could be more than 5 times cheaper to own. As the size of the enterprise to cover gets larger, DAS TCO is more comparable, but even for large enterprise (>250 people) Smallcells could still work-out with 50% lower TCO. Such comparisons would vary on a case by case basis, for example often larger enterprise locations are already covered with DAS for 3G which can be reused.
The “toolbox” approach to solving indoor coverage challenges makes sense, but for Small Medium Enterprise locations Smallcells seem to be the right tool for the job.
Hi, Guys, I'm a beginer with NSO, and now i want to re-deploy a service to fix the broken configs, but i can't remove any other out-of-band configs that have been made to the device, what command or step i should do to implement this? Any help w...
Hello everybodyI have a problem implementing Multicast in a small provider with some VRFs.Attached is a diagram that can be used to better understand the typology. As you can see we have two types of routers R1 is an XR and R2 is an xe, in both...
Is there a link on proper way to downgrade the IOS on ASR 1001-X? Currently one unit is on 17.x. I know the simple way would be to wipe flash and reinstall IOS 16.x but we have licenses on the ASR1001-X that we need to preserve. &nbs...
In EVPN A/A + IRB both PE in same EVI have BVI playing a default GW role. Its not supported to have BVI to be shutdown on one of PEs, In this case if if traffic hit this PE with DMAc equal to BVI Custom MAC, then it will drop this traffic du...
Hi, I would like to know if you can recommend me devices which can be use to replace gateways AS5300 - AS5400 & AS5350, in a VOIP network actually running with those models. Our network is running under sc7 and SIP, with E1s managing calls.Please let ...