Recently there has been lots of discussion about a webinar given by Openet and Allot that showed this slide.
It showed a scenario where mobile operators charge for over the top service and applications, but charge nothing for applications provided by the mobile operator itself. Some of the scenarios are flat rate fees while other scenarios are usage based. This generated a fairly significant reaction from various people in the industry both positive and negative, but lets face it, mostly negative. It created blogs on the need for net neutrality and for the opposite.
This one chart might now replace the famous traffic growing faster than revenue chart as the most overused slide in the industry.
In contrast, Disruptive Analysis published a blog why application-specific policy and charging won’t work.
What’s interesting about this whole discussion is that our industry used to charge for data based on usage, and no one came to the Field of Dreams. We then moved to flat rate charging and not only is everyone coming to the Field, all sorts of application providers are learning how to profit from it (well, at least make some revenue), and generating significant traffic, which generates profitability concerns. Thus the chart and the question is whether and by how much the pendulum will swing back in the other direction.
There are many challenges with a pendulum swing. Consumers are now used to a model where they don’t have to worry about what they use.I personally think it would be challenging for the pendulum to swing back too far.All operators would have to swing back to the same level.If only a single operator resists, customers would likely move to that provider.Even if all of the operators move to a service specific model, it’s likely an upstart would come in and try to take advantage of the situation.
What does this mean for monetization? It means that operators must think about which models make sense, less drastic models, or more importantly new business models.For example, It doesn’t mean that operators won’t be able to create tiered services.This is now becoming common.This leads to opportunities such as Freemium services where you zero rate certain applications, or Toll Free Broadband where a content provider pays for the data being sent. I would personally be willing to pay for some specific content on a monthly basis; for example, I’d pay to see the New England Patriots play (as long as it’s a flat additional fee and they keep winning). As a consumer, I like to pay flat rate. IIt’s like a breakfast buffet at a hotel.You pay a flat fee for access to certain tables of different types of food, and you can eat as much as you want at that table.
2011 is going to be an exciting year. It will be interesting in a year to see how much changed (or not). Let me know what you think.
Hi, Guys, I'm a beginer with NSO, and now i want to re-deploy a service to fix the broken configs, but i can't remove any other out-of-band configs that have been made to the device, what command or step i should do to implement this? Any help w...
Hello everybodyI have a problem implementing Multicast in a small provider with some VRFs.Attached is a diagram that can be used to better understand the typology. As you can see we have two types of routers R1 is an XR and R2 is an xe, in both...
Is there a link on proper way to downgrade the IOS on ASR 1001-X? Currently one unit is on 17.x. I know the simple way would be to wipe flash and reinstall IOS 16.x but we have licenses on the ASR1001-X that we need to preserve. &nbs...
In EVPN A/A + IRB both PE in same EVI have BVI playing a default GW role. Its not supported to have BVI to be shutdown on one of PEs, In this case if if traffic hit this PE with DMAc equal to BVI Custom MAC, then it will drop this traffic du...
Hi, I would like to know if you can recommend me devices which can be use to replace gateways AS5300 - AS5400 & AS5350, in a VOIP network actually running with those models. Our network is running under sc7 and SIP, with E1s managing calls.Please let ...