Usability and debugability is close to my heart. We have all so many "little things" that we always wanted to see and have in XR that never seem to happen.
THAT IS GOING TO CHANGE!
On Tuesday July 29th we're having a development event to take care of as many usability enhancements as we can!!
The target is to create a feature pack (a-la the now "well-known" service packs) with all the existing smu's, but with this extra functionality. After the event, we'll post a read-out as to what it is that you're gonna get from this.
What I need from YOU!
I am sure you have a need or idea, if you can comment and post a comment with your list of requirements so I can add them to the dev list for the usability event. I need as many ideas as we can!
If you have a desire or idea, this is YOUR chance to get it on the list and have it taken care of sooner then you'd expect.
Now one gotcha (of course :) large(r) features we can't pull off in that event, but all kinds of little show, debug or usability enhancements sure thing. So eg interface-range, yup I know that one, that is a bit too big due to complexity, but removing the \n from the bgp v6 neighbor (my pet-peeve) is definitely something! And oh, we're already getting the BE/bundle-ether mapping in 513 :)
I want to limit downstream internet bandwidth for each customer. But need separate inter and domestic traffic.And within a customer, all hosts will be share bandwidth together. Everything looks good in my lab with this configuration below becau...
We are migrating some of these A99-8X100GE-TR modules to the smaller ASR-9904 platform and running A9K-RSP880 and IOS 6.5.3. When the module installed, some messages come up requiring the FPD upgrade and following the FPD upgrade new errors appear.&...
Hi, In order to get a usable MTU of 9198, I declare the mtu 9212 on a bundle-ether port (9198+14). The configuration is following : RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:rtr1#sh run int be1interface Bundle-Ether1 mtu 9212 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:rtr1#sh run int ...
Dear all, Currently I am tackling with the following topology.Based on this, it is pingable between R3 and R2 Global route through MP-BGP based multi-VRF, however I am curious about actually which VRF (VRF-A or VRF-B) can be selected on thi...
Curious if anyone might have some insight on a BGP session setup problem I'm seeing. I'm having trouble bringing up a BGP peering session between IOS-XR VRF and IOS.[ IOSXR_PeerA (VRF)-----IOSXR(Global) ]---(internal network, 3 hops)---IO...