cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
145292
Views
50
Helpful
141
Comments
xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Introduction

In this document I'll discuss the operation, use and some examples on RPL, or the route policy language.

 

Route policies are mandatory for E-BGP peers, at least a "pass-all" like RPL is required in order to import and export routes.

 

Core Issue

In IOS we used to have route-maps to control the import, export and manipulation of routes. IOS-XR doesn't have route-maps but something more powerful called route policy language. It is a very programmatic approach in route-maps.

 

Where as IOS route-maps operate as a series of statements which are executed sequentially, Route-policies not only operate sequentially but provide the ability to invoke other route-policies much like a ‘C’-program is able to call separately defined functions. This enables to creation of hierarchical policies. In addition, and most importantly into respect the scope of this paper, route-policies are ‘compiled’ into a run-time executable portion of code.

Editing route policies

When you have configured a route policy that you want to edit afterwards, you need to restart from scratch or copy paste the existing RPL as entering the route-policy configuration would wipe the existing one out:

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#route-policy test

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl)#if med eq 100 then

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl-if)#set local-preference 100

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl-if)#endif

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl)#end-policy

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#commit

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#

 

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#route-policy test

Fri Jan 20 14:58:39.900 EDT

% WARNING: Policy object route-policy test' exists! Reconfiguring it via CLI wil

l replace current definition. Use 'abort to cancel.

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl)#

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl)#if local-preference eq 123 then

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl-if)#set origin incomplete

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl-if)#endif

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config-rpl)#end-policy

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#commit

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#do sh run route-policy test

Fri Jan 20 14:59:53.705 EDT

route-policy test

  if local-preference eq 123 then

    set origin incomplete

  endif

  end-policy

!

 

As you can see the previous if statement is completely gone, copy pasting and offline editing are also not very easy to use! There is a solution!

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#edit route-policy test ?

  emacs  to use Emacs editor

  nano   to use nano editor

  vim    to use Vim editor

  <cr>

 

I tend to prefer VI and then you can edit your RPL in a VI like manner:

 

Editting screen:

 

route-policy test

  if local-preference eq 123 then

    set origin incomplete

  else if med eq 100 then

    set weight 44

  endif

  end-policy

!

~

~

 

I am inserting the bold italic lines and press "ZZ" to exit and save the VI editor. (Note I made a config error in RED)

 

~

~

"/dev/shmem/rpl_edit.115790135" 8 lines, 149 characters written

Proceed with commit (yes/no/cancel)? [cancel]:

 

 

Now the config error here by splitting "else if" and look what happens when I try to commit:

 

Parsing.

149 bytes parsed in 1 sec (148)bytes/sec

 

% Syntax/Authorization errors in one or more commands.!! SYNTAX/AUTHORIZATION ER

RORS: This configuration failed due to

!! one or more of the following reasons:

!!  - the entered commands do not exist,

!!  - the entered commands have errors in their syntax,

!!  - the software packages containing the commands are not active,

!!  - the current user is not a member of a task-group that has

!!    permissions to use the commands.

 

  else if med eq 100 then

    set weight 44

  endif

  end-policy

 

Continue editing? [no]:yes

 

"/dev/shmem/rpl_edit.115790135" 8 lines, 145 characters written

Proceed with commit (yes/no/cancel)? [cancel]: yes

Parsing.

145 bytes parsed in 1 sec (144)bytes/sec

Committing.

Prepared commit in 0 sec

 

1 items committed in 1 sec (0)items/sec

Updating.RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jan 20 15:04:20.101 : config[65848]: %MGBL-CONFIG-6-DB_COMMIT : Configuration committed by user 'root'. Use 'show configuration commit changes 1000000522' to view the changes.

 

Updated Commit database in 1 sec

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#

 

So from now one when you want to edit RPL's, prefix sets or as-sets or community sets, use this editor

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#edit ?

  as-path-set       edit an as-path-set

  community-set     edit a community-set

  extcommunity-set  edit an extended-community-set

  policy-global     edit policy-global definitions

  prefix-set        edit a prefix-set

  rd-set            edit a rd-set

  route-policy      edit a route-policy

 

 

RPL operation

 

1_RPL_elements.jpg

 

2_RPL_boolean.jpg

 

RPL Actions

The route policy requires a "ticket" for the route to be accepted or dropped. These are the different operatators

 

Pass – prefix allowed if not later dropped

pass grants a ticket to defeat default drop

Execution continues after pass

Set – value changed, prefix allowed if not later dropped

Any set at any level grants a ticket

Execution continues after set

Values can be set more than once

Done – prefix allowed, stop execution

Drop – prefix is discarded

Explicit drop stops policy execution

Implicit drop (if policy runs to end without getting a ticket)

 

One thing important to add is here that if you have a policy that is "sequential" like

if med 10 then

 set med 20

endif

if med 20 then

 drop

endif

the execution will NOT drop prefixes with MED10. The reason for that is, although somewhat counter intuitive, that the sequence of operation uses the ORIGINAL value during processing, hence the second if statement will not match for the what was original med of 10...

If you like to get the behavior that both 10 and 20 are dropped, you could do something like this:

if med 10 then drop

else if med 20 then drop

else pass

endif

Don't forget the final pass, as there is an implicit deny.

 

Hierachical policies

The ability to reference one policy in another

 

route-policy one

 

     set weight 100

 

end-policy

 

 

 

route-policy two

 

     set med 200

 

end-policy

 

 

 

route-policy three

 

    apply two

 

    set community (2:666) additive

 

end-policy

 

 

 

route-policy four

 

    apply one

 

    apply three

 

    pass

 

end-policy

 

 

Parameter Passing

The ability to call one policy with a variable to be used in another policy:

 

route-policy one ($med)

 

  set med $med

 

end-policy

 

 

 

route-policy two

 

  apply one (10)

 

end-policy

 

Or with 2 variables:

 

route-policy three ($med,$origin)

 

  set med $med

 

  set origin $origin

 

end-policy

 

 

 

route-policy four

 

  apply three (10, incomplete)

 

end-policy

 

Inline vs. Named sets

In your RPL you can put the prefix set or as-path etc in the IF statement construction or you can reference a separate set with the AS-list.

They look like the following:

 

 

Inline:

route-policy use_inline

 

  if as-path in (ios-regex '_42$', ios-regex '_127$') then

 

    pass

 

  else

 

    drop

 

  endif

 

end-policy

 

 

Named-Set:

 

as-path-set named_set

 

  ios-regex '_42$',

 

  ios-regex '_127$'

 

end-set

 

 

route-policy use_named

 

if as-path in named_set then

 

    pass

 

  else

 

    drop

 

  endif

 

end-policy

 

There is a performance difference between teh two. the Named Set is obviously slightly slower, but is easier to manage especially when the list gets long. I would personally recommend for short lists to use inline and for longer lists to use the named-set.

 

Each individual set element results in a separate call to the expression engine:

 

as-path-set as_51

ios-regex ‘_2129$’,

ios-regex ‘_2147$’,

ios-regex ‘_2856$’,

ios-regex ‘_3486$’,

ios-regex ‘_6432$’,

ios-regex ‘_6468$’,

ios-regex ‘_7310$’,

ios-regex ‘_7768$’,

ios-regex ‘_7862$’,

ios-regex ‘_8296$’

end-set

 

The same set can be written as follows:

 

as-path-set as_51

ios-regex '_(2129|2147|2856|3486|6432|6468|7310|7768|7862|8296)$'

end-set

Example AS-Path-Set, Community-Set and Prefix-Set

 

AS-PATH

 

as-path-set aset1

 

    ios-regex ’_42$’,

 

    ios-regex ’_127$’

 

end-set

 

Prefix-Set

 

prefix-set galaga

 

171.68.118.0/24,

 

192.168.0.0/16 ge 16 le 30

 

end-set

 

Community-Set

 

community-set cset1

 

      12:34,

 

      12:78,

 

      internet

 

end-set

 

•Match by value, wildcard, or regular expression
•2 16 bit values separated by colons
•Support for common community keywords

internet

local-AS

no-advertise

no-export

private-as

 

 

Show commands

show bgp policy route-policy <name>

Only display prefixes matching policy – filter show command

 

RP/0/0/CPU0:XR#show rpl route-policy states

ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached

INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached

UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced

 

 

Working with Prefix-Sets

 

Here some examples of using prefix-sets. The use of the variable masks is not easy to understand and I found the CCO documentation not very explanatory, so here a few extra words on that.

 

Prefix:                                        Explanation:

 

10.0.1.1,                match only one possible value, 10.0.1.1/32, mask omitted means 32.

 

10.0.2.0/24,             match only one possible value, 10.0.2.0/24

 

10.0.3.0/24 ge 28,       match a range of prefix values, from 10.0.3.0/28 to 10.0.3.255/32

 

10.0.4.0/24 le 28,       match a range of values, from 10.0.4.0 to 10.0.4.240 (eg we can’t “reach” the last 4 bits)

 

10.0.5.0/24 ge 26 le 30, matches prefixes in the range from 10.0.5.0/26 to 10.0.5.252/30

 

10.0.6.0/24 eq 28        match any prefix of length 28 in the range from 10.0.6.0/28 through 10.0.6.240/28

 

10.0.7.2/32 ge 16 le 24, matches any prefix of length 32 in the range 10.0.[0..255].2/32 (from 10.0.0.2/32 to    10.0.255.2). This is a little funky given the “7” in the 3rd octet which effectively    becomes don’t care.

 

10.0.8.0/26 ge 8 le 16   matches any prefix of length 26 in the range 10.[0..255].8.0/26 (from 10.0.8.0/26 to    10.255.8.0/26)

 

 

Let me visualize it with some real outputs.

I am using an RPL that sets the local pref to 1234 if it matches the prefix set, and that prefix set is as per the above sample list.

 

10.0.3.0/24 ge 28,             match a range of prefix values, from 10.0.3.0/28 to 10.0.3.255/32

=> What is excluded here ?  Is 10.0.3.128 excluded from the prefix range ?

 

Whether the .128 is excluded or not, depends on the mask of the prefix being advertised.

Basically what this means is that if the mask of the route is larger or equal than 28 (so 29,30,31,32) then it matches:

 

   Network            Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path

 

*>i10.0.3.0/28        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.3.16/28       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.3.32/28       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4,5} i

*>i10.0.3.48/28       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 i

*>i10.0.3.0/26        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.3.64/26       8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.3.2/31        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.3.4/31        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4,5} i

*>i10.0.3.6/31        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 i

*>i10.0.3.0/24        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4} i

 

 

10.0.4.0/24 le 28,             match a range of values, from 10.0.4.0 to 10.0.4.240 (eg we can’t “reach” the last 4 bits)

=> What is excluded here ?  10.0.4.1, .2, .3, .17, .18,.19,.20, etc?

 

Same as before, but now where the mask is less than 28, so routes in the 10.0.4.x range that have a mask that is shorter 28 will get “hit”.

The mask on the prefix itself sets the “base”. Eg 10.0.3 would not match here as it is not part of the 10.0.4.0/24. Seems obvious but just to be clear ...

 

   Network            Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path

*>i10.0.4.0/24        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.4.0/26        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.4.64/26       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.4.128/26      8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4,5} i

*>i10.0.4.48/28       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 i

*>i10.0.4.64/28       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4,5} i

*>i10.0.4.24/30       8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 i

*>i10.0.4.28/30       8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 {3} i

 

 

10.0.5.0/24 ge 26 le 30,       matches prefixes in the range from 10.0.5.0/26 to 10.0.5.252/30

Combining the previous two together on the .5.0 range:

 

*>i10.0.5.4/30        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.5.8/30        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4,5} i

*>i10.0.5.12/30       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 i

*>i10.0.5.4/31        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4,5} i

*>i10.0.5.6/31        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 i

*>i10.0.5.5/32        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4,5,6} i

*>i10.0.5.6/32        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 i

*>i10.0.5.0/25        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.5.128/25      8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.5.64/26       8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.5.128/26      8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4,5} i

 

10.0.7.2/32 ge 16 le 24,      matches any prefix of length 32 in the range 10.0.[0..255].2/32 (from 10.0.0.2/32 to 10.0.255.2). This is a little funky given the “7” in the 3rd octet which effectively becomes don’t care.

 

*>i10.0.7.2/32        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.7.3/32        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.0.2/32        8.1.1.1                100   1234      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.0.3/32        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.1.7.2/32        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4} I <<doesn’t match because of 2nd octet

 

If I slightly change the prefix statement to: 10.0.7.4/32 ge 16 le 24

 

*>i10.0.7.0/30        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4} i

*>i10.0.7.4/30        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 {3,4} i

*>i10.0.7.8/30        8.1.1.1                100    300      0 2 3 {4,5} i

 

Still no match as the base mask is not met on the prefixes received.

So the /<whatever> determines the MASK of the route I wanted to match. whereas the GE/LE provide me the variance in either that mask (if bigger) or from the other octects (if smaller then the /mask)

 

 

 

Verifying performance of your RPL

 

To determine what in your route-policy is consuming the majority of the time, you can use route profiling.

It allows some data collection in the background with minimal impact  on the execution of the rpl. After the collection has been running for  some time you can use show commands to find out which steps take a lot  of time in the execution and make some improvements.

Once we figure out which portion of the policy is performance drag, its much easier to try out an alternative. Something like regex match always failing means we need to evaluate route using prefix match prior to validating its as-paths.

 

Example usage:

debug pcl profile detail

then

Router# show pcl protocol bgp 10 neighbor-in-dflt default-IPv4-Uni-1.2.3.4 policy profile
 

Policy execution profile

 

Protocol : bgp 10

 

Attachpoint : neighbor-in-dflt

 

AP Instance : default-IPv4-Uni-1.2.3.4

 

Policy Name : rpl_profile(nexthop)

 

Pass : 10

 

Drop : 5

 

Total : 15

 

Avg execution time : 110usec

 

 

 

Router#sh rpl route-policy rpl_profile detail

 

route-policy test

 

  apply test2

 

  done

 

end-policy

 

!

 

route-policy test2

 
  delete extcommunity rt all
 

end-policy

 

!

 

route-policy rpl_profile($p_nexthop)

 
  if next-hop in $p_nexthop then
 
    set local-preference 155
 

    set med 155

 

  else

 
    set local-preference 77
 

    set med 77

 

  endif

 
  set community (0:0)
 

  apply test

 
  set extcommunity rt (1:1)
 

end-policy

 

!

 
Router# show pcl protocol bgp 10 neighbor-in-dflt default-IPv4-Uni-1.2.3.4 policy profile detail
 

Policy execution profile

 

Protocol : bgp 10

 

Attachpoint : neighbor-in-dflt

 

AP Instance : default-IPv4-Uni-1.2.3.4

 

Policy : rpl_profile(nexthop)

 

Pass : 15

 

Drop :  0

 

Total : 15

 

Avg execution time : 110usec

 

 

 
Node Id   Num visited  Avg exec time  Policy operation
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
           15          0usec                    route-policy rpl_profile
 

 

 
PXL_0_5            15         99usec                        if next-hop pfxmatch ... then
 

 

 
PXL_0_3            10          0usec                              set local-preference 155
 
PXL_0_4            10          0usec                              set med 155
 
PXL_0_6            15          0usec                              community assign
 
                            15          0usec                           route-policy test
 

 

 
                            15          0usec                                       route-policy test2
 

 

 
PXL_0_1            15          0usec                                                rt delete-all
 
                            15          0usec                                            
 

 

 
PXL_0_2            15          0usec                                         
 

 

 
PXL_0_8             0          0usec                              rt assign
 
                             0          0usec                                
 

 

 

 

 
PXL_0_1             5          0usec                                          set local-preference 77
 
PXL_0_2             5          0usec                                          set med 77
 

 

 

GOTO :                                                                                    PXL_0_6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
                            0          0usec                     
 

 

 

Router#

 

 

Usable attachpoints for RPL

 

attacpoint.PNG

 

Changing or modifying Route policies (or prefix/community sets)

 

As you have noticed when editting RPL's you need to reconfigure the complete policy in the regular CLI. An easier method is using the "edit" option described above.

When you are changing your RPL or prefix-set or any other list that RPL is using, it will trigger a few things:

If the RPL is used for BGP and your peer is not REFRESH capable, it will restart your BGP session.

If the peer is REFRESH capable a full table refresh is executed.

The reason for that is, that the RPL change or say prefix set change could have excluded some routes before that now may need to be imported.

 

On the Receiving Side:

For BGP, routes that are filtered are completely discarded and are NOT kept in memory with some kind of mark that says bgp rpl filtered.

We will use route refresh to obtain the routes again from the neighbor whenever there is a change in inbound route policy.

For this the neighbor has to be refresh capable, else we have to do clear bgp.

 

When the BGP peer receives a route refresh request it sends the complete table again to the requesting peer. While asking for the table they ask for the relevant (AFI, SAFI) table. When the routes are received from the peer an inbound filter if any is applied and the routes are aggregated.

 

On the sending side:

if I apply an RPL basically removing some previously advertised route, would BGP send withdraws for these now filtered routes?

What would rpl/bgp do when the RPL is modified to:

           1) do advertise some previously filtered routes

To advertise previously filtered routes it is similar to regular advertising of routes

           2) stop advertising previously advertised routes

BGP will send withdraws when it stops advertising previously filtered routes.

 

 

 

 

 

Xander Thuijs, CCIE #6775

Sr. Tech Lead ASR9000

Comments
racarvalho
Community Member

Hi Xander,

 

That's it !!!

i was missing the ":", I've read that the underscore was the symbol to use in regular expressions.

 

_ (underscore)

 

Matches a comma (,), left brace ({), right brace (}), the beginning of the string, the end of the string, or a space.

 

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4-2/getting_started/configuration/guide/gs42crs/gs42aexp.html

 

Thanks

RAC

 

 

xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Sweet! great to hear that it is the solution! :)

cheers!

xander

imadhassan
Beginner
Beginner

Thank you for this doc. Very well defined and easy grasp the examples.

xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

and thank you for the nice comment!! :)

cheers!

xander

bedgewor
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Alessio,

 

As a supplement to this awesome article that Alexander put together, I recommend that you pick up a copy of my book IP Routing on Cisco IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR  ( http://goo.gl/7FNfVr ).   Chapter 11 (~82 pages) goes into detail on IOS XR's RPL in the back half of the chapter.

Happy Labbing,

-brad

mberend
Community Member

Nice article, thanks.

I was wondering is it now impossible to do a route policy on odd and even routes in IOS XR, lets say in the third octet, like it is I believe possible with ACLs/route maps? Basically I don't see the ability to use wildcard masks, only bit length in the prefix sets.

I hope I am making sense with this question :)

 

bedgewor
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

I've never seen this used on a production network before, but yes it is possible.   RPL only allows for the referencing of RPL sets, but inline logic can use wildcard matching.   It gets the trick done, but is not as scalable.

 

Here is the RPL:

 

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9006-B#show rpl route-policy ACL
route-policy ACL
  if destination in (82.210.0.0 0.0.254.255 ) then
    pass
  endif
end-policy
 

 

BGP Table Before Hand:

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9006-B#show bgp
<SNIP>
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best
              i - internal, r RIB-failure, S stale, N Nexthop-discard
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network            Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 82.210.208.124/30  82.210.208.125           0             0 8151 i
*> 82.210.211.4/30    82.210.208.125           0             0 8151 i

Processed 2 prefixes, 2 paths

 

And after testing RPL

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9006-B#show bgp route-policy ACL
<SNIP>
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network            Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 82.210.208.124/30  82.210.208.125           0             0 8151 i

Processed 1 prefixes, 1 paths

 

------------------------------------------------------------

Brad Edgeworth

Author of:  IP Routing on Cisco IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR 

CCIE# 31574         Routing/Switching & Service Provider

 

 

 

mberend
Community Member

Brad,

 

Thanks, this is great. Didn't know you could do that.

I did once used it in production to influence the uplink destinations to multiple service providers in an attempt to get the most bw in the uplink direction on multiple links. The usefulness is debatable, but it is good to know you can do it :)

 

 

Hi Xander

 Could you explain me what's the difference between rpl-test1 and rpl-test2 in term of performance or any term. And which one you recommend to deploy it?

==================================
route-policy rpl-test1
 if med eq 100 then
     set local-preference 100 
 elseif med eq 200 then
     set local-preference 200
 elseif med eq 300 then
     set local-preference 300
 elseif med eq 400 then
     set local-preference 400
 else
     set local-preference 0
 endif
==================================
route-policy rpl-test2
 if med eq 100 then
     set local-preference 100 
 endif
 if med eq 200 then
     set local-preference 200 
 endif
 if med eq 300 then
     set local-preference 300 
 endif
 if med eq 400 then
     set local-preference 400 
 else
     set local-preference 0
 endif
end-policy
==================================

 

 

Thank you

Pichet

xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

hi pinchet,

yeah functionally they do the exact same thing. There is also compiler wise not much difference in the way these will get installed. I feel that option 1 is a bit more clear in terms of reading/understanding the operation, but that is a personal thing and has no bearing on the technical aspects of it :).

cheers!

xander

Thank you. 

 

^_^

wblackcenic
Beginner
Beginner

Great explanation of the RPL function, however, I was hoping you could help clarify one thing.  If there are multiple elseif statements in a policy and two or more elseif statements match a particular route, which statement gets applied? 

For example:

route-policy test

if community matches-any test_1 then

set med 10

elseif community matches-any test_2 then

set med 20

else

pass

endif

end-policy

!

community-set test_1

  123:456

end-set

!

community-set test_2

  123:789

end-set

 

If a route was received via BGP and was tagged with both 123:456 and 123:789, would MED get set to 10 or 20?

 

Thank you for the help.

xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

thank you! :) and great question. here is how it works:

if you do something like this:

if TEST-1 then

 set SOMETHING to "X"

if TEST-2 then

 set SOMETHING to "Y"

if both TEST-1 and TEST-2 are true, then the end result is that SOMETHING *first* gets set to "X" and later on to "Y", so what you see and the end of the execution is "Y".

In case you do the same thing, but then with an elseif:

if TEST-1 then

 set SOMETHING to "X"

elseif TEST-2 then

 set SOMETHING to "Y"

end

In that case if both TEST-1 and TEST-2 are both true again, after the TEST-1 setting, you'll end up with "X" since the elseIF is not interpreted anymore.

Although a "set" action provides a "pass" ticket in the RPL, it doesnt stop the execution of the policy UNLESS you use the keyword "done" in that case, useful in the first example, you could say set SOMETHING "X" and "done" so that the 2nd if statement is not perceived effectively giving you the same outcome as the 2nd example with the else if.

In your example, the MED will be 10, the first "if" is matched, the elseif is not perceived.

xander

wblackcenic
Beginner
Beginner

Thank you for the quick response, Xander.  Your explanation makes perfect sense and was my understanding, just wanted a confirmation before scheduling a service-impacting maintenance. 

Appreciate the help!

Denis Mulyalin
Beginner
Beginner

Hi Xander,

thank you for your explaination of RPL usage, however i've tryed to configure next-hop set action based on the RT that route has and it does not work for me:

route-policy IMPORT_to_vrf_test1234
  if extcommunity rt matches-any (1234:1234) then
    set next-hop 3.3.3.3
  endif
end-policy

!

vrf test1234
 address-family ipv4 unicast
  import route-policy IMPORT_to_vrf_test1234
  export route-target
   1234:1234

!

#show route 3.3.3.3
Routing entry for 3.3.3.3/32
  Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected)
  Installed Jul  6 10:04:25.612 for 00:13:03
  Routing Descriptor Blocks
    directly connected, via tunnel-te1234
      Route metric is 0
  No advertising protos.
!

#show bgp vrf test1234
Mon Jul  6 10:18:02.667 msk
BGP VRF test1234, state: Active
BGP Route Distinguisher: 10.69.72.0:1234
VRF ID: 0x6000001d
BGP router identifier 10.69.72.0, local AS number 39374
BGP table state: Active
Table ID: 0xe000002c   RD version: 24837099
BGP main routing table version 24841947

Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best
              i - internal, r RIB-failure, S stale, N Nexthop-discard
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network            Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 10.69.72.0:1234 (default for vrf test1234)
*> 1.1.1.1/32         0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i

Processed 1 prefixes, 1 paths
 

the version of IOS XR is 5.1.3.

Maybe you know what is going wrong here and can advise me how to configure this future correctly.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Recognize Your Peers
Quick Links