had question from live chat, but the guy left withoud saying bye, and log in back to the session, been ignored, sad.
A Cisco Support Engineer will join as soon as available.
Borislav Atanassov has joined this session.
from lime soft to All Participants:
hi
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Hi
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
May I have the serial number of the router?
from lime soft to All Participants:
yah sure, hold on
from lime soft to All Participants:
SER150900PO
from lime soft to All Participants:
and SER150900PM
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
ok
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
So, what static route do you need on the device?
from lime soft to All Participants:
ok, let me explain
from lime soft to All Participants:
i have two sites connected to each other via VPN, 192.168.1.x , and 192.168.2.x
from lime soft to All Participants:
my ftp server is at 192.168.2.99
from lime soft to All Participants:
i can access via site to site vpn using rvs4000
from lime soft to All Participants:
but issue is very slow due to my internet connection
from lime soft to All Participants:
so i decided to setup a wireless bridge (my remote site is about 500 meters away)
from lime soft to All Participants:
my intention is to set primary static route to another subnet via wireless bridgei
from lime soft to All Participants:
secondary via VPN tunnel, but it seem like the RVS has no option for me to add statics route as i mention above
from lime soft to All Participants:
or you can refer to my discussion address here - > https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2183204
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
The RVS4000 has options for static route
from lime soft to All Participants:
i'm not sure, can you view my diagram over there?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
When you set up the static route in RVS4000 - just set the remote subnet, for example 192.168.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0 and the gateway (which needs to be the device whose internet you want to use)
from lime soft to All Participants:
it can't, because i wanted to route LAN to LAN
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Why is this wireless bridge conencting the same subnet? 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.1.11
from lime soft to All Participants:
example i wanted to route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
from lime soft to All Participants:
is that wrong?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
192.168.1.xxx and 192.168.2.xxx are already connected through VPN, right?
from lime soft to All Participants:
yup, but it's to slow, so i decided to use a wireless bridge to connect them
from lime soft to All Participants:
and vpn just as a backup or user to users connection only
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Aha, so you just want to use a bridge
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
However, I am not sure that the wireless bridge will be faster
from lime soft to All Participants:
i have tested ping each other (without) RVS4000 is fast
from lime soft to All Participants:
coz currently all 192.168.2.x will route to the VPN
from lime soft to All Participants:
i wanted if 192.168.2.99 is routed to LAN
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Yes, but actually you want to conenct both subnets twice - once through VPN and twice through the wireless brigde
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
I think that these two can not work at the same time
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Because you will have a loop
from lime soft to All Participants:
if i decided to disconnect the VPN?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Then it should work, yes
from lime soft to All Participants:
how?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
just connect the RVS4000 to the wireless bridge on both ends
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
and set two static routes - one on each router poiting to the other
from lime soft to All Participants:
the static route at 192.168.1.1 would look like how? 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 ????
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Yes 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 yes - you should be pointing to the whole subnet
from lime soft to All Participants:
point to where?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
To the remote subnet
from lime soft to All Participants:
when i was in the static route GUI
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
192.168.2.0 is the whole subnet
from lime soft to All Participants:
it ask for destination IP, subnet < and gateway
from lime soft to All Participants:
so destination ip = 192.168.2.0
from lime soft to All Participants:
subnet 255.255.255.0
from lime soft to All Participants:
gateway ? what should i fill in?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Destination IP Address Enter the network address of the remote LAN segment.
For a standard Class C IP domain, the network address is the first three fields of
the Destination LAN IP, while the last field should be zero.
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
yes
from lime soft to All Participants:
so destination ip = 192.168.2.0
from lime soft to All Participants:
subnet 255.255.255.0
from lime soft to All Participants:
so gateway ? what should i fill in?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
The gateway can be the remote router's IP address
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
because the router is poiting there
from lime soft to All Participants:
if i type 192.168.2.1 it say ip is not alive, if i put in 192.168.1.1 it say invalid
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Not alive means unreachable
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
May be the link between the two routers is not ok?
from lime soft to All Participants:
see...
from lime soft to All Participants:
if vpn is desconnected, of coz router 1 would not know router's LAN IP
from lime soft to All Participants:
that's why we need to add static route at route 1
from lime soft to All Participants:
is the route doesn't allow another ip address which is unreachable, means no point
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Yes, but the wireless bridge should be working, otherwise there would not be any traffic between the two subnets
from lime soft to All Participants:
ok, wireless bridge is only communicating between 192.168.1.10 <--> 192.168.1.11
from lime soft to All Participants:
and how possible my lan ip at router 2 which is 192.168.2.x can ping to 192.168.1.x before i can actually add static route at router #2
from lime soft to All Participants:
example if i wanted to communicate from 192.168.2.100 to 192.168.1.11, i should add static route 182.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.1 (the gateway of router #2)
from lime soft to All Participants:
for your information, i at router #1 can ping to 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
that means both access points, right?
from lime soft to All Participants:
yup
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
and on the other end?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
From both ends?
from lime soft to All Participants:
at router #2 i cannot ping to 192.168.1.x (1.10, 1.11 and so on which is under 1.x)
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Yes, but how is #2 setup?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
On both end NAT is disabled, right?
from lime soft to All Participants:
is under gateway mode
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Whenever there;s gateway mode NAT is enabled
from lime soft to All Participants:
if i set to router mode, my internet is not working and same, i cannot add static route either it will always say invalid gateway and network is unreachable
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Let me verify something
from lime soft to All Participants:
ok
from lime soft to All Participants:
btw my internet connection both end is using pppoe
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
That means dynamic public IPs?
from lime soft to All Participants:
wan ip is static
from lime soft to All Participants:
but i need to use pppoe to connect
from lime soft to All Participants:
so i need to router to do nat
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
I see
from lime soft to All Participants:
are you looking in to it?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
yes
from lime soft to All Participants:
ok
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
So, how are you setting up the wireless bridge, what device do you use?
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
devices?
from lime soft to All Participants:
it's a wap54g
from lime soft to All Participants:
i set it to bridge mode
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
and what is the distance between them?
from lime soft to All Participants:
about 500 meters
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
You use a wap54G to cover 500 meters?
from lime soft to All Participants:
i use a 1mw pannel antena
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
Its range is much lower
from lime soft to All Participants:
tested host ping to host no problem
from lime soft to All Participants:
getting 20 ms respones
from Borislav Atanassov to All Participants:
aha
from lime soft to All Participants:
aha ?
