I'm having a problem with Dual-Wan load balancing on the GV042G.
We have 2 DSL connections and would like to load balance traffic between them, however we keep having problems with lost connections.
This seems particularly noticeable with things like SSH. The connection seems to work fine initially, however if they are left idle for 5-10 minutes, then the connection is often hung when you return to it.
I can understand such problems with udp, or indeed, http which is stateless, where multiple GET requests could be sent out different links because they are all separate TCP connections.
However, I don't understand the behaviour with SSH. It is one, single, stateful TCP connection. Surely, once a connection is open, then all packets which are part of that connection should be sent out the same wan link?
If I create 2 protocol bindings, such as:
All http(s) traffic --> Wan-1
All other traffic --> Wan-2
Then things seem to work ok. But that doesn't seem like load-balancing to me.
Am I doing something wrong? Should the RV042G load balance persistent connections properly?
Running Latest Firmware: v4.2.2.08 - 2013.04.26
Message was edited by: bobb crosbie - Added Firmware Version
Thank you for using Cisco Support Forums. I suggest enabling the Network Service Detection option under Dual-WAN management page and changing the Retry timeout to a few seconds and Retry count to 5-10. For further details on Dual-WAN management and how to configure the above options, please refer to the article below:
What you have observed as far as the secure traffic goes is normal.
Any kind of secure connection gets broken if you suddenly start sending data from a different IP address, so HTTPS should be bound to one interface, like you have done. I am not so sure about SSH, but if it doesn't work I'd say try it with a binding since it is also encrypted communication.
When you are using load balancing you can disable the failure detection method, it is really only meant to be used for the Failover Mode. I have seen it cause odd issues with load balancing where it disables a link for no reason. Try just turning the detection methods off on both WAN interfaces.
Let me know how that goes.
Network Support Engineer - Cisco Small Business Support Center
Small businesses are facing the realities of the new normal and wondering what are the best ways to monitor, protect, manage and grow. Cisco understands the unique needs of small businesses and is committed to help overcome their top IT challenges. The fi...
What does the new normal mean for small business? Join this CiscoChat to learn how Cisco Designed, the portfolio curated for small business, can help small businesses adapt and thrive through the new normal and beyond.
We'll take your questions live...
Hi, i have an RV130W Wireless VPN router on which contrary to all advertisements i do not have gigabit LAN.The port links state 1000 full duplex however any LAN transfer is capped at about 20MBps, primarily because the router CPU reaches 100%. So this giv...
Join us in an exclusive Cisco Customer Connection briefing for a demonstration on the management capabilities within the Cisco Business Wireless product line for small businesses. For the lone-IT-superman, it is critical that the network products are easy...
This may be a simple question so I hope someone can help. We have several Cisco SG300\500 switches in L2 mode. Each switch has 8 VLANS and VLAN 1 is still native (For now). We do all routing between VLAN's on our firewall. After reading several ...