We are seeing rate limit drops on a new internet ethernet connection. I can't seem to find an explanation that does not have Qos in the reason for the rate limit drops.
Here is what we see on a ASA 5520 running 6.4.
Interface GigabitEthernet1/2 "outside", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is VCS7380 rev01, BW 1000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
Auto-Duplex(Full-duplex), Auto-Speed(100 Mbps)
Input flow control is unsupported, output flow control is unsupported
Media-type configured as RJ45 connector
Description: Outside connection to TWT port 0/1
MAC address c84c.xxxx.xxx, MTU 1500
IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
189630202 packets input, 151713633224 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 201 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
0 L2 decode drops
168620541 packets output, 79755781476 bytes, 0 underruns
0 pause output, 0 resume output
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 late collisions, 0 deferred
0 input reset drops, 0 output reset drops
406895 rate limit drops
input queue (blocks free curr/low): hardware (0/0)
output queue (blocks free curr/low): hardware (0/0)
Traffic Statistics for "outside":
189563376 packets input, 148146509320 bytes
169040114 packets output, 76924197238 bytes
2782075 packets dropped
1 minute input rate 1398 pkts/sec, 1258861 bytes/sec
1 minute output rate 1195 pkts/sec, 418651 bytes/sec
1 minute drop rate, 8 pkts/sec
5 minute input rate 2109 pkts/sec, 1888351 bytes/sec
5 minute output rate 1881 pkts/sec, 1019056 bytes/sec
5 minute drop rate, 11 pkts/sec
When I do a 'sh run int g1/2' it shows nothing but the actual interface so I think that its not being dropped by us. The interface utilization is low so I dont think thats the issue.
I am sure there is an easy explanation of why there are packets dropping, does anyone have it?
THANKS!!!!
Charlie,
Couple of items.
Shawn Eftink
CCNA/CCDA
Please rate all helpful posts and mark correct answers to assist others searching for solutions in the community.
Thanks, I moved it.
Also had wrong version... I was looking at asdm version, whoops.
Thanks,
C.T.