06-28-2022 06:32 AM
I successfully stacked two C9500-48Y4C.
The Uplink (single 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP) works fine.
Then I tried to connect a C9200 with an LACP port-channel (Twe1/0/6 and Twe2/0/6).
But I only get:
%ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Twe2/0/6 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port.
To troubleshoot I now wanted to use a single connection without port-channel between the stack and the C9200.
Stack: interface TwentyFiveGigE2/0/6 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk C9200: interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk
The C9200 does receive packets (like cdp and vtp) from the stack.
But there are not packets incoming on the stack.
TwentyFiveGigE2/0/6 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Twenty Five Gigabit Ethernet, address is 3c8b.7f00.d386 (bia 3c8b.7f00.d386) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is SFP-10GBase-SR input flow-control is on, output flow-control is off ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:21:46 Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 9000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicasts) 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input 0 input packets with dribble condition detected 14882 packets output, 1130522 bytes, 0 underruns Output 1300 broadcasts (0 multicasts) 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets 0 unknown protocol drops 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
I tried different SFP+-Modules and cables.
Any idea where the issue could be?
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-29-2022 05:55 AM
After some troubleshooting tipps ("self loop test") from the sales person, I found out the issue was not between sfp module and C9500, but C9200.
It was this bug.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa11962
Update C9200 from 17.03.04b to 17.3.5 solved the issue!
06-28-2022 07:21 AM
LACP port channel use channel-group mode active
stack - Cat 9500 SVL ?
06-28-2022 07:35 AM
I know.
I used channel-group mode active to create the Port-Channel.
show etherchennel summary showes "LACP" as Protocol.
But like I wrote, the issue seems to be deeper, even without port-channel.
show stackwise
Stackwise Virtual Configuration: -------------------------------- Stackwise Virtual : Enabled Domain Number : 1 Switch Stackwise Virtual Link Ports ------ ---------------------- ------ 1 1 HundredGigE1/0/51 HundredGigE1/0/52 2 1 HundredGigE2/0/51 HundredGigE2/0/52
Chassis Type: C9500-48Y4C Switch Number 1 Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. ---+-----+--------------------------------------+--------------+-------------- 1 52 Cisco Catalyst 9500 Series Router C9500-48Y4C FDO26XXXXXX Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status ---+--------------------------------+----+------------+------------------+-------- 1 xxxx.yyyy.D4C0 to xxxx.yyyy.D4F3 2.0 17.3.1r[FC2] 17.05.01 ok Mod Redundancy Role Operating Redundancy Mode Configured Redundancy Mode ---+-------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------- 1 Active sso sso Switch Number 2 Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. ---+-----+--------------------------------------+--------------+-------------- 1 52 Cisco Catalyst 9500 Series Router C9500-48Y4C FDO26XXXXXY Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status ---+--------------------------------+----+------------+------------------+-------- 1 xxxx.yyyy.D380 to xxxx.yyyy.D3B3 2.0 17.3.1r[FC2] 17.05.01 ok Mod Redundancy Role Operating Redundancy Mode Configured Redundancy Mode ---+-------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------- 1 Standby sso sso Chassis 1 MAC address range: 160 addresses from xxxx.yyyy.d4c0 to xxxx.yyyy.d55f Chassis 2 MAC address range: 160 addresses from xxxx.yyyy.d380 to xxxx.yyyy.d41f
06-28-2022 07:40 AM
this is more of SVL config, can you post
both the side :
show run interface port-channel X ( x is the value using ?)
show interface x/x
show etherchannel X summary
show interface port-channel x switchport
show version
06-28-2022 07:35 AM
interface TwentyFiveGigE2/0/6 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk C9200: interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-1000 switchport mode trunk
Can you make sure the 2/0/6 is operating as 10Gig and not 25?
HTH
06-28-2022 08:12 AM
Like I said. I try to simplify the scenario and have not configured the port-channel anymore.
The Ports operate at 10G.
C9500 Stack
(I changed the port and hardware chassis in case 2/0/6 was defect)
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type Twe1/0/21 connected trunk full 10G SFP-10GBase-SR
C9200
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type Te1/1/4 connected trunk full 10G SFP-10GBase-SR
It kinda works now!
I found some threads (3 years old) about compatibility issues with third-party modules
But they should be fixed with newer IOS versions.
I just tried two original Cisco 1G modules and it works.
I already configured
service unsupported-transceiver no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid
Maybe an upgrade to 17.6.3 helps...
06-28-2022 08:22 AM
Yeah, Cisco devices don't always work with 3rd party vendor optics. I use one 3rd part vendor's optics that works pretty much with all Cisco devices. So, it's a kind of trial and error process.
HTH
06-28-2022 08:33 AM
But they should be compatible according to this:
(search for "11555/SFP-10GLR-31")
And the sales person asked me about my devices to verify they were compatible.
Maybe I have more luck tomorrow.
06-28-2022 10:15 AM
@Reza Sharifi mention that not all SFP compatible and even worse cisco not support TAC for 3-rd party SFP.
https://www.fiberlandtec.com/how-to-check-sfpmodule-optical-signal-strength.html
check this link see if the optical signal is strength is OK (this only one step to check SFP).
06-28-2022 08:28 AM
I understand, that is the reason i requeted interface output to see if the interface gone in error disable mode.
Thank you for the clarification.
06-28-2022 05:33 PM
@fhk-cwempe wrote:
Maybe an upgrade to 17.6.3 helps...
Use 17.3.5 instead.
NOTE: Currently suspended testing 17.6.3 because we have already found "0-config" bugs in two test switches.
06-29-2022 05:55 AM
After some troubleshooting tipps ("self loop test") from the sales person, I found out the issue was not between sfp module and C9500, but C9200.
It was this bug.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCwa11962
Update C9200 from 17.03.04b to 17.3.5 solved the issue!
06-29-2022 06:18 AM
Thanks alot friend for sharing solution.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: