09-17-2013 03:31 AM - edited 03-07-2019 03:30 PM
Hi guys,
I would like interconnect 2 lan. One with 172.17.86.X submask 255.255.0.0 and another with 192.168.1.X submask 255.255.255.0
So i must have a router. I found RV180. It has an wan port, but could i set it in lan port ?
Doest it a good choice or there's a better way than this rv180 ? (only router ?)
Thanks for help !
09-17-2013 04:08 AM
Hi,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv180w/administration/guide/rv180w_admin.pdf
pg 34 configuring vlan membership
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
09-17-2013 04:50 AM
Hi,
Thanks for this, but that's not what i mean.
I would like to config my lan 1 on wan port, and lan 2 to another port from switch.
If you want, i don't want to use rv180 as wan router but as lan router only.
My problem is : I would like few PCs on le lan1 can print (on lan printer) on the lan2, and if i don't mistake, i must use router to do this. 2 lan are currently physically separe
So rv180 can be helpful for my problem or a better solution to do this ?
Thanks a lot
09-18-2013 05:15 AM
Bump please
09-18-2013 07:22 AM
It's depending on what kind of switches you use. If you a switch to supports VLANs you need to configure the port that is attached to the RV180 as a trunk port. On the RV180 you use only one physical interface with multiple sub interfaces (page 36) to allow interVLAN communication.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide