07-06-2012 04:50 AM - edited 03-07-2019 07:37 AM
Hi all,
I have a problem with a stack of four 3750-X (IPBase, 12.2(55)SE3)
Scenario:
- Sw1 and Sw2 form a power-ring
- Sw3 and Sw4 form a power-ring
- only Sw2 has an additionnal PS
The only power-config I have is the following:
stack-power stack power1
mode redundant
!
stack-power switch 2
stack power1
stack-power switch 1
stack power1
Every minute I get the following log-message:
Jul 6 13:47:47 CEST: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-PRIO_CONFLICT: Switch 1's power stack has conflicting power priorities
The Message-guide didn't help me any further ...
Any idea what can cause these messages?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-10-2012 08:41 AM
Hi,
In power stack 1 the "High port priority value" is the same for both switch 1 and 2. Could change one of those to have unique values and check for errors after that?
Power stack name: power1
Stack mode: Redundant
Stack topology: Ring
Switch 2:
High port priority value: 12
Switch 1:
High port priority value: 12
Kind Regards,
Ivan
**Please grade this post if you find it useful.
07-06-2012 05:33 AM
Hi,
This message indicates there are two sets of devices (either a switch or a set of PDs) within the same power stack that have the SAME priority level (1 - 27). If you saw this once, it's likely it just occurred while you were configuring their priorities.
Please check the priorities first and share the outputs of "show stack-power" and "show env all". If there are matching, then you need to change that. e.g.:
Switch(config)#Stack-power switch 4 Power-priority high 11 Power-priority low 23
power-prority switch 5
If it is continually happening even the output of "show stack-power" shows there are different, then there is chance you hit CSCtg20513. You can either upgrade the IOS or apply a workaround:
- toggle the stack ports (shut/no shut) on the unit that is incorrectly reporting this error.
config t
stack-power switch
standalone
no standalone
Kind Regards,
Ivan
**Please grade this post if you find it useful.
07-06-2012 05:47 AM
the toggling of the ports didn't help. The priorities are all different:
sw-ham1-core-01#show stack-p
Power stack name: power1
Stack mode: Redundant
Stack topology: Ring
Switch 2:
Power budget: 223
Low port priority value: 20
High port priority value: 12
Switch priority value: 2
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: c464.13a0.9780
Neighbor on port 2: c464.13a0.9780
Switch 1:
Power budget: 223
Low port priority value: 21
High port priority value: 12
Switch priority value: 5
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: c464.13a0.b600
Neighbor on port 2: c464.13a0.b600
Power stack name: Powerstack-3
Stack mode: Power sharing
Stack topology: Ring
Switch 4:
Power budget: 190
Low port priority value: 22
High port priority value: 13
Switch priority value: 4
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: 503d.e5c8.0d80
Neighbor on port 2: 503d.e5c8.0d80
Switch 3:
Power budget: 190
Low port priority value: 21
High port priority value: 12
Switch priority value: 3
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: 503d.e5c8.1f00
Neighbor on port 2: 503d.e5c8.1f00
sw-ham1-core-01#sh env a
FAN 1 is OK
FAN 2 is OK
FAN PS-1 is OK
FAN PS-2 is NOT PRESENT
TEMPERATURE is OK
Temperature Value: 29 Degree Celsius
Temperature State: GREEN
Yellow Threshold : 46 Degree Celsius
Red Threshold : 60 Degree Celsius
SW PID Serial# Status Sys Pwr PoE Pwr Watts
-- ------------------ ---------- --------------- ------- ------- -----
1A C3KX-PWR-350WAC LIT154009G8 OK Good Good 350/0
1B Not Present
2A C3KX-PWR-350WAC LIT154100KM OK Good Good 350/0
2B C3KX-PWR-715WAC LIT154314Z1 OK Good Good 715/0
3A C3KX-PWR-350WAC LIT145108RW OK Good Good 350/0
3B Not Present
4A C3KX-PWR-350WAC LIT145108S6 OK Good Good 350/0
4B Not Present
SW Status RPS Name RPS Serial# RPS Port#
-- ------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------
1 Not Present <>
2 Not Present <>
3 Not Present <>
4 Not Present <>
07-10-2012 08:41 AM
Hi,
In power stack 1 the "High port priority value" is the same for both switch 1 and 2. Could change one of those to have unique values and check for errors after that?
Power stack name: power1
Stack mode: Redundant
Stack topology: Ring
Switch 2:
High port priority value: 12
Switch 1:
High port priority value: 12
Kind Regards,
Ivan
**Please grade this post if you find it useful.
07-10-2012 09:16 AM
Thanks Ivan, that did it! I wasn't aware that also these High-values had to be different.
07-10-2012 11:55 PM
welcome, Karsten!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide