07-03-2015 06:18 AM - edited 03-08-2019 12:49 AM
Can someone sanity check the below if possible. I simply want several interfaces on an ASR920 to be part of the same VLAN. The ports however are connecting to host devices so need to be untagged ports:
ethernet evc VLAN101
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
no ip address
service instance 1 ethernet VLAN101
encapsulation untagged
bridge-domain 101
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/3
no ip address
service instance 1 ethernet VLAN101
encapsulation untagged
bridge-domain 101
!
interface BDI101
ip address 10.0.0.254 255.255.255.0
It works fine but I don't know if it's the correct method of doing this using EVC's? Should I instead have 'encapsulation default'? Or is there another method I shoudl be using instead?
Thanks
07-03-2015 06:58 AM
I removed my comment (sorry I mixed the question with another)
07-03-2015 06:58 AM
This is on an ASR920 so it's not done the same. 'Switchport' isn't even an option on the ports as the ASR920 is a router.
You have to use EVC's. I just need to clarify the correct method of using EVC's for untagged ports.
05-17-2016 10:09 PM
Hi
this config looks fine to me, but
have you attempted STP (Spanning tree) integration?
ASR920 only supports MST, backwards compatible with Rapid-PVST+
This is somthing I am struggling with (CDP seems to work) between the ASR920 and ME3600 I am running but not STP, any pointers?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide