01-15-2019 11:30 AM - edited 03-08-2019 05:02 PM
So lets say I have an etherchannel where many hosts talk to 1 server, would source mac load-balancing be the best option?
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-15-2019 03:53 PM
01-15-2019 11:35 AM
Yes, source MAC is a good option since you have multiple sources and one destination.
HTH
01-15-2019 12:09 PM - edited 01-15-2019 12:13 PM
Hello @CiscoPurpleBelt,
Greetings,
I would like to say that the word "many hosts talk to a server" is not accurate enough to get an accurate reply,
simply because there are several scenarios of topology that can be described by the same word, but the way of load balance differs!
Let me explain it in detail, for example, if your hosts are connected to switches and then to a switch finally that is connected to the server, so you can use the source mac address for the load balance as @Reza Sharifi mentioned!
but if there is a router(s) in between the hosts and the server, you mustn't use the source mac address, as the source mac addresses will be the router's one (the last router which is the nearest one to the server) in this case, you will need to use source IP address for load balancing!
The idea that the switch uses an algorithm according to it, it is choosing the link that will carry the data, and this algorithm is applied to each packet, and according to the load balancing method that you configured, it will use it for that calculation! so if you configured the source mac address, and there is a router, every packet will contain the same mac address, so the results of the calculations will be the same all the time, which means that ONLY one link will be used!
Happy to help!
Please, don't forget to rate any helpful reply and to mark solutions!
Bst Rgds,
Andrew Khalil
01-15-2019 03:53 PM
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: