09-12-2023 02:04 PM - edited 09-12-2023 02:25 PM
Works fine in 17.8.1 and below then they arbitrarily made a change to behavior of the hardware in version 17.9.1. This is a terrible business practice and obviously an attempt to grab more profit even though really Cisco trying to make money off SFPs and linecards??? Pretty sure Cisco's last quarter revenue was pretty good. What their marketing/engineering team probably failed to realize is that this creates real issues for customers with 1 gig circuits, and older fiber that doesn't support the distance with available 10 gig optics.
Our team to mitigate this issue is having to potentially procure SFP-10G-LRM and swap SUP1 from our HQ building where our fiber supports the distances. If you run into this issue as well, please comment and help the complaint to Cisco product management and engineering.
09-12-2023 07:23 PM - edited 09-12-2023 07:24 PM
Why use 17.9.1 and not, say, 17.9.3 or 17.9.4?
Next, move that link to a port where the adjacent ports are not being used.
09-13-2023 05:48 AM
Seems like a minor bug? TAC confirmed this is the case?
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: