09-06-2017 06:22 AM - edited 03-08-2019 11:56 AM
Hello Guys,
I have received a call complaining an ip phone down and after checking the logs "phone worked again" I found this log on the 2960 switch...
Controller port error, Interface Gi1/0/5: Power Controller reports power Imax error detected
What does this means? have the employee tried to connect something to this port of the PC port on the phone? what are reasons that a log like this may occure because of.
Notice:
The logs before this time stamp of the occurence didn't mention any thing aout this port going down because of cable un plugging.
09-06-2017 06:49 AM
Hey
Is that a Non Cisco IP phone ? Its an issue with how the switch is recieving teh POE what is the phone , may need a POE injector if its not using same stanards as your switch
what POE type does the phone use , was it up before yes , what POE is avilable on the 2960 , show power inline
Its not your user anyway most likely :)
09-06-2017 07:27 AM
Hello Mark,
Thanx for the reply.
about the device type, just cisco 7965 ip phone.
Gi1/0/5 auto on 12.0 IP Phone 7965 3 30.0
my douts that the user may connected not allowed device, but the switch logs didn't mention anything about this port up/down befor this log timestamp am adking about.
TIA
09-06-2017 07:41 AM
Well you can stop him doing that by using port security and lock down the port to his pc and mac address only
If theres no logs chances of you finding out now unless hes honest are slim , as the device is up and working looks fine from output
7965s use poe class 3 which is fully supported on 2960s , could of just been a glitch too i do get phones dropping off the odd time too on some of my 6500 blades at access layer
Like example for ps
Switch(config)# interface gig0/2
Switch(config-if)# switchport port-security
Switch(config-if)# switchport port-security maximum 1
Switch(config-if)# switchport port-security mac-address 00-d0-ba-11-21-31
Switch(config-if)# switchport port-security violation shutdown
Switch(config-if)#end
09-06-2017 07:49 AM
Hello Mark,
Actually the port security and sticky to the phone mac addresss is already applied, which make me wonder why the switch didn't report the violation.
wiered, isn't it? :)
09-06-2017 08:02 AM
should have seen something in it then logs then if it violated thats bit odd what did the port look like when you logged in was it down/down or err-disabled ?
09-06-2017 08:05 AM
09-07-2017 12:35 AM
Hello Mark,
No violation has occured to the port, just port went down.
after testing the phone on another port "that what I've been told" the phone was working fine "ofcourse violation has been occured on the port and handled it", the phone is back on it's original port with new cable and it worked.
09-07-2017 12:37 AM
09-06-2017 03:13 PM
09-07-2017 12:37 AM
09-07-2017 05:32 AM
09-10-2017 02:36 AM
09-10-2017 03:21 PM
09-12-2017 05:56 AM
Hello Leo,
in orrder to have the phone working again, we had to change the cable.
but if you still want the command output, I ran it and it was as follow:
EDGE-18#show cable-diagnostics tdr int gi 1/0/5
TDR test last run on: September 12 14:50:26
Interface Speed Local pair Pair length Remote pair Pair status
--------- ----- ---------- ------------------ ----------- --------------------
Gi1/0/5 1000M Pair A 65 +/- 0 meters Pair A Normal
Pair B 71 +/- 0 meters Pair B Normal
Pair C 72 +/- 0 meters Pair C Normal
Pair D 70 +/- 0 meters Pair D Normal
____________________________________
Am not familiar with this command, what does it tell you please?.
TYIA
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide