01-31-2013 07:57 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:26 AM
Hi,
I have 2 3750 switch stacks which I would like to have redundant trunks between them. This will provide two physical connections traveling through different geographical locations for redundancy in the event that a cable is severed. I couldn't find anything in regards to setup/config. Does it matter if I go stack1/switch1 to stack2/switch1 and stack1/switch2 to stack2/switch2 or should they cross to opposite switches like a stack cable? I don't think that should be necessary, but couldn't find any documentation. Should there be an issue with loops?
Thanks!
01-31-2013 08:05 AM
I had exactly that and it was working very well. Make a cross-chassis etherchannel on each end and it does not matter whether you cross the connections or go parallel.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
01-31-2013 08:47 AM
I have also implemented the same and it is working fine.
You will not have face any issues
Regards,
Ahmed Umair
01-31-2013 10:14 AM
Thanks for the response Kevin. So to reap the full benefits use LACP or active mode? I know PAgP will not work in this case.
02-01-2013 12:57 AM
I would set active on both sides. Do NOT be tempted to force "on", and keep spanning tree for safety.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide