11-11-2013 08:40 PM - edited 03-07-2019 04:33 PM
We are building a new site with 8 floor each floor will have around 300 people plus WAP.........as standard we will be conecting to MPLS private WAN cloud via BGP back to the datacentre.....i have couple of questions and need some help:
in core we will have 6509's and on floor it will be 3850
my question are as under:
1-Shd i use VSS and conect WAN links direct to each swicth. All access floor swicthes will be conected to both 2X6509 switches.
2- or shd i use routing between two 6509 and put two headend 2900 series router and run IBGP etc between them.
can some one tell me what would be more efficent and good design and why
i am confuse what to run on layer two as well
11-11-2013 09:03 PM
If you are yet to purchase the core switch, 6509, then I recommend you think about getting a pair of 6807-X and VSS them together.
11-12-2013 05:16 AM
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Whether to use VSS depends on whether you really need an additional core chassis for redundancy (vs. single chassis with every other component being redundant) and whether you're going to run your 3850 edge as L2 or L3.
What VSS adds is redundancy of a 2nd chassis, which adds somewhat to overall reliability. However, two chassis running L3 adds even a little more to overall reliability as you're adding redundancy of a second IOS.
So, if you believe you need the additional redundancy of a 2nd chassis, if your edge will be L2, I would go with VSS. If your edge will be L3, don't use VSS.
For your 2900s, if using VSS, Etherchannel them. If not using VSS, using routed links. For either, your choice of routing protocol.
BTW, 6500s are going away, so if buying new, like Leo, I would suggest considering its replacement, the 6807-XL. (Depending on your core device needs, if buying new, you might also consider the 6880 or 4500 series.)
11-12-2013 11:23 AM
Hi The_guroo! I agree with Leo and Joseph in terms of choosing the core switch, the 6800 is the way to go(versus the 6500). I'm not an expert in terms of network design but I can help you talk to someone who can further assist you with this. If you're interested, send me an emal at firstname.lastname@example.org
11-12-2013 01:52 PM
In regards to 6880-X/6807-X, look at the 6880ia.
The current limitation to implementing 6880ia is the amount of stacks and the amount of switches. Plus also the type of line card required.
In regards to line card, currently, only 6904-10Gb is required. And the maximum limit of 6880ia is seven stacks and each stack has three switches. This means you can deploy no more than 21 6880ia switches.
It is not yet clear when the new line card support will be announced and but I'm just letting you know in case things improve a bit.
Let us know how you plan to design your wireless network as we can also help you there.
11-12-2013 04:07 PM
I did nearly the same setup 1 year ago with a new building and 4 floors. I did 2 x 6500 in vss, 4509's on 2 floors and 3700's on the remaining floors. L3 ether channels to the core then BPG to our MPLS provider.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: