cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
295
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Getting NAT correct on a 6509

poirot1967
Level 1
Level 1

I need a little NAT advice. I am routing between 2 internal vlans, 192.168.32.0/24 and .64/24. I need to NAT these 2 vlans to the outside/public vlan 165.x.x.x. Here is the config I have come up wth :

ip nat pool niscpool 165.x.x.105 165.x.x.105 prefix 24

access-list 1 permit 192.168.32.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 1 permit 192.168.64.0 0.0.0.255

ip nat inside source list 1 pool niscpool overload

interface vlan 1

ip nat outside

interface vlan 3

ip nat inside

interface vlan 4

ip nat inside

Will this work? Any suggestions?

TIA

2 Replies 2

ssoberlik
Level 4
Level 4

If you are planning to implement NAT with Cat6509 supervisor itself, then you cannot go for 2 inside interfaec. Cisco IOS does not allow that configuration.

Refer to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca75b.html#wp1003513

But you can implement this scenario with Firewall module FWSM.

You can configure multiple SVIs to be part of the 'inside' interface.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_module_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080577c7f.html#wp1176033

Hi

Is this a limitation of the 6500 or the IOS.

As far as i am aware there is nothing to stop you applying the "ip nat inside" statement to more than one interface in IOS.

Jon

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card