04-17-2012 09:40 PM - edited 03-07-2019 06:11 AM
I've just installed a 4507 and this message keeps appearing in the logs, I have not come accross this before, how do I resolve it?
003074: Apr 17 23:07:36: %C4K_RKNOVA-4-INVALIDTOKENEXPIRED: (Suppressed 201 times)Expired token 254 in the invalid token list (NumEntries: 6) of type IrmPortId other id == 4294967288
Thanks in advance!
Brendan
04-17-2012 11:46 PM
Hello Brendan,
Message is primarily cosmetic however there are several triggers for it.
What is your IOS version (show ver) and what is you HW installed (show mod). Do you have any wccp configured? WCCP might not be supported on your platform hence causing similar message?
Nik
04-18-2012 01:51 PM
Thanks Nikolay,
WCCP is not enabled.
cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M
1 48 10/100/1000BaseT UPOE E Series WS-X4748-UPOE+E
3 6 Sup 7L-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7L-E
4 6 Sup 7L-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7L-E
5 12 10GE SFP+ WS-X4712-SFP+E
7 48 10/100/1000BaseT UPOE E Series WS-X4748-UPOE+E
1 48 10/100/1000BaseT UPOE E Series WS-X4748-UPOE+E
3 6 Sup 7L-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7L-E
4 6 Sup 7L-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7L-E
5 12 10GE SFP+ WS-X4712-SFP+E
7 48 10/100/1000BaseT UPOE E Series WS-X4748-UPOE+E
04-18-2012 06:45 PM
And what is IOS release?
04-18-2012 08:07 PM
Thanks... Version 03.02.00.XO
10-11-2012 12:49 PM
Hi,
I have the same issue that appeared out of nowhere on one of the seven 4507 chassis. I am running IOS XE 3.3.0SG on this one since I hit a bug on IOS XE 3.3.1SG that caused all modules to be reset.
I think it is a cosmetic bug; I found the following bug id but I did not do OIR (online insertion removal of a linecard)...
I have the following modules in the chassis:
1. WS-X4748-UPOE+E
2. WS-X4748-UPOE+E
3. WS-X45-SUP7-E
4. WS-X45-SUP7-E
5. WS-X4712-SFP+E
Here's the same log message I see repeatedly (it is repeated exactly the same every 5 minutes
%C4K_RKNOVA-4-INVALIDTOKENEXPIRED: STANDBY:(Suppressed 403 times)Expired token 407 in the invalid token list (NumEntries: 9) of type IrmPortId other id == 4294967287
I might open a TAC case to have them investiguate but it seems for now that this is not impacting the switch.
Any suggestions?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide