Hello,
New to the ISR 4400s and I'm finding that there are some commands that seem to be missing.. I'm trying to do very simple things like prevent snmp,ssh, etc.. to any IP other than the management interface (G0)..
I've tried using MPP - the "control-plane host" command is missing.
I've tried using ACL/Class Map/Policy Map/ Service-Policy - the "drop" command is missing from the Policy Map ...
Is there something I've not done? This routers are right out the box and have the version of code isr4400-universalk9.03.16.04b.S.155-3.S4b-ext.SPA.bin...
Thanks for any help..
Solved! Go to Solution.
MPP should be in that code i use it , what does it show you when you check the help ?
i have 155.3 in flash but moved up slightly recently
XXX(config)#control-plane host
XXX(config-cp-host)#?
Control Plane host configuration commands:
exit Exit from control-plane host configuration mode
management-interface Configure interface for receiving network management traffic
no Negate or set default values of a command
XXX(config-cp-host)#do sh ver | i 15
Cisco IOS Software, ISR Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.5(3)S5a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
System image file is "bootflash:isr4300-universalk9.03.16.05a.S.155-3.S5a-ext.SPA.bin"
XXX(config-cp-host)#
That's what's so crazy... I'm only seeing :
nR-IR-02(config-cp)#?
Control Plane configuration commands:
exit Exit from control-plane configuration mode
no Negate or set default values of a command
service-policy Configure QOS Service Policy
nR-IR-02(config-cp)#do sh ver | i 15
Cisco IOS Software, ISR Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.5(3)S4b, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "bootflash:isr4400-universalk9.03.16.04b.S.155-3.S4b-ext.SPA.bin"
hmm what license you got running i got appxk9, securityk9,ipbasek9 and voice but it wouldnt be in the uck
feature navigator
Cisco just checked and it looks like just the base license... one would think that the control plane configuration would be on that seeing as how it's to secure the router... I'm gonna have to do a little research with the customer to see what the deal is..
I'm pretty much in agreement here... I'm looking at the security license... It's crazy to me that "securing" the actual control plane would require a different license nowadays...
I've got Cisco TAC verifying that supposedly as we speak....