08-17-2016 10:04 AM - edited 03-08-2019 07:02 AM
I have read few networks books and desgin guides from cisco, and they always reommed subnets.
what do you experts think?
08-18-2016 05:33 AM
Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
There much truth in what your network architect notes, but I would quibble with some of it.
Many modern NICs for some time have be able to filter out non-interesting unicast and multicast, but not broadcast.
Broadcasts hitting a NIC generally force the client to actually analyze the content, to see if its something the host needs. Advanced NIC features, like off-loading, I don't believe help much with this. Faster host CPUs help, but processing a bunch of needless traffic (often generating system interrupts) certainly isn't going to improve host performance. BTW, on network equipment that have ASIC support, they often don't dramatically increase the device's CPU capacity, so a stream of broadcasts seen by such a network device can be very detrimental to its performance. (The latter is why its highly recommended to have a device's management IP on a dedicated management network. Ordinary gateway IPs, though, are still exposed.)
When networks collapse, it's often the case of "the straw that broke the camel's back". I.e. everything is working fine until you go over the edge.
As you potentially double the number of hosts each time you shift the address block size, you move closer to some edge. /24s have a long history of not going over the edge. (They also, though, were Class C address blocks.)
In my current environment, I pushed for using /20s for WLANs, but they don't do broadcasts, and for the last couple of years we've been using them w/o issue.
We have some /23 LANs, those too have been fine.
Personally, I would be concerned about using /20s for LANs.
Interestingly, you network architect notes /20 DHCP range is much smaller, so how much smaller? I.e. If you have a /20 that limits the hosts to a smaller address block, effectively you're still using smaller address blocks.
BTW what's an "ALA" site.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: