cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1717
Views
5
Helpful
4
Replies

Nexus 9508 Input/Output Rates Higher Than Port Speed

Michael Mertens
Level 1
Level 1

I have a 9508 interface running at 1 Gbps, but is showing TX/RX rates much higher than 1 Gbps...Is it a bug? I'm running NX-OS 7.0.3 I3. I also notice that "Clear counters" on the interface or the switch does not clear the counters. Please see below. (This is a FEX)...Any input would be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Mike

 

 

Ethernet151/1/5 is up
admin state is up,
Hardware: 100/1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 94d4.6978.2966 (bia 94d4.6978.2966)
Description: L82E15 - efkxtsmp031
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec
reliability 255/255, txload 255/255, rxload 255/255
Encapsulation ARPA, medium is broadcast
Port mode is access
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s
Beacon is turned off
Auto-Negotiation is turned on, FEC mode is Auto
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is on
Auto-mdix is turned off
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped 4d14h
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:21:03
0 interface resets
30 seconds input rate 4508360867360 bits/sec, 684904541 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 8943593443944 bits/sec, 919411812 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
input rate 4506.79 Gbps, 684.53 Mpps; output rate 8937.92 Gbps, 918.88 Mpps
RX
334630976479 unicast packets 0 multicast packets 185268 broadcast packets
334631161941 input packets 275449005498474 bytes
0 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression packets
0 runts 0 giants 0 CRC 0 no buffer
0 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun 0 underrun 0 ignored
0 watchdog 0 bad etype drop 0 bad proto drop 0 if down drop
0 input with dribble 0 input discard
0 Rx pause
TX
446186948220 unicast packets 391886784 multicast packets 2591637942 broadcast packets
449170472934 output packets 546099820306165 bytes
0 jumbo packets
0 output error 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision
0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble 0 output discard
0 Tx pause

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

You are most likely hitting defect - CSCuv29358

I would recommend you upgrade your code to 7.0(3)I7(3) or I7(4).

 

Thanks
--Vinit

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

Vinit Jain
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

What kind of FEX's are you running? This seems to be a cosmetic issue.

Thanks
--Vinit

The are N2K-C2348TQ-10GE Vers 7.0(3)

You are most likely hitting defect - CSCuv29358

I would recommend you upgrade your code to 7.0(3)I7(3) or I7(4).

 

Thanks
--Vinit

Thanks!

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card