cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
673
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies

One lan/subnet out of several is not communicating

Earl McEachron
Level 1
Level 1

I have several vlans on a stack of 2 Cisco 3750G's. I can reach devices connected to all but one vlan. Nothing special is being done to that vlan. I also have other similar stacks configured similarly. They are working just fine. I can move the device to another stack and it works.

Does anyone have any idea where I should be looking for a resolution? Thanks!

 

6 Replies 6

jmattbullen
Level 1
Level 1

posting the config will probably be required.  but is the vlan interface up/up when you do a "show ip int brief"

Can you post the output of "sh spanning-tree vlan x" from the stack where it's not working, with x being the vlan that is not working.

Just saw your reply Andre. Thanks! I did do this and noted the strange behavior in my follow-on notes above. I disconnected the server and had the user delete the bridge. It works fine without the bridge.

I assume I would need to create a Port Channel to accommodate the bridge.

Hello

Is the comunication failing throughout the lan of just in the this one stack?

sh vlan bri
st vtps status
 

res

Paul


Please rate and mark as an accepted solution if you have found any of the information provided useful.
This then could assist others on these forums to find a valuable answer and broadens the community’s global network.

Kind Regards
Paul

Earl McEachron
Level 1
Level 1

I have found the issue. Not sure of the solution yet. But first, let me answer the questions posed below:

Paul - the communication fails in just this one stack.

Matt - there is no vlan interface; but, all the connected port interfaces are up/up.

The Issue:

      vlan 10 (offending vlan) is missing from the span tree forwarding state list.

      vlan 10 Root Role interface is an interface (g1/0/20) connected to a server rather than the

      uplink port channel (po8). The server owner attempted to create a bridge with two adapters on the server. Instead of causing an err-disabled, the switch changes the vlan Root role to one of the interfaces that the server's adapters are connected. BY un plugging the adapter at g1/0/20, the valn communicates again with the Root role returning to Po8.

This behavior is unfamiliar to me. If someone can explain this to me, I'd appreciate it. - Thanks!

 

Earl McEachron
Level 1
Level 1

I have found the issue. Not sure of the solution yet. But first, let me answer the questions posed below:

Paul - the communication fails in just this one stack.

Matt - there is no vlan interface; but, all the connected port interfaces are up/up.

The Issue:

      vlan 10 (offending vlan) is missing from the span tree forwarding state list.

      vlan 10 Root Role interface is an interface (g1/0/20) connected to a server rather than the

      uplink port channel (po8). The server owner attempted to create a bridge with two adapters on the server. Instead of causing an err-disabled, the switch changes the vlan Root role to one of the interfaces that the server's adapters are connected. BY un plugging the adapter at g1/0/20, the valn communicates again with the Root role returning to Po8.

This behavior is unfamiliar to me. If someone can explain this to me, I'd appreciate it. - Thanks!

 

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card