cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
4243
Views
0
Helpful
17
Replies

police xxxx exceed-action drop is not avilabe under policymap??!!!!

Dr.X
Level 2
Level 2

hi ,

im using qos

here is my config

##########################

class-map match-all wireless

match access-group name wireless

!        

policy-map wireless

class wireless

  bandwidth 15000

class class-default

  fair-queue

!        

!        ############################

as u see, im using qos to gurantee 15 mega for users of the access-list wireless

in the same time i want the traffic not to exceed 16 mega ,

i just want to give 15 gurantee , and  up to 16  if aviable

im trying to type the command

police 160000 exceed-action drop

but the ios is not accepting it ,

im wondering  how to  type it and limit the bw up to 16 mega ???

here is the outut when i try to type it

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Gateway2(config-pmap-c)#police 16000 ?

  <500-512000000>  Burst bytes

  bc               Conform burst

  conform-action   action when rate is less than conform burst

  pir              Peak Information Rate

  <cr>

Gateway2(config-pmap-c)#police 16000

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

as u see there is no exceed-action but instead , there is

conform-action   

=====================

regards

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00807f3f8d.html#wp1297330

here you can find full examples for the 7600 series.

Please rate if you believe i have been helpful

Alessio

View solution in original post

17 Replies 17

policy conform-action transmit exceed-action drop...

conform first!

HTH

Alessio

hi ,

should i type the command

police 15000 conform-action transmit  exceed-action drop

or

police 16000 conform-action transmit  exceed-action drop

i just want to gurantee 15 , and give upto 16 if avaibale

regards

John Blakley
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Under your police command, specify a conform action and then your exceed action should be available.

HTH,

John

HTH, John *** Please rate all useful posts ***

hi ,  wt should i give a value to confim action ?

should i give it the gurantee bw ???

in this case , does the command bandwith  id needed ??

regards

؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟

Hi Ahmed,

please do not mix garanteed bandwidth with policing.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/command/reference/qos_n1.html#wp1047146

Please read the usage of this command aand especially the usage guidelines in this doc.

Alessio

hi ,

after all of that ,

the command is not being accepted

bandwidth command is not supported in input direction for this interface

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy output  wireless

bandwidth command is not supported in output direction for this interface

Configuration failed on GigabitEthernet1/1

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy output  wireless

*Jul 24 11:18:45.650: %QOS-6-POLICY_INST_FAILED:

Service policy installation failed

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy input  wireless

bandwidth command is not supported in input direction for this interface

Configuration failed on GigabitEthernet1/1

Gateway2(config-if)#

Gateway2(config-if)#

neither output nor input !!!!!!!!!!

i guess you nee to remove the bandwidth command first. and then to re-apply it in the direction you need

send the qos/interface config if you can

Alessio

hi ,

i removed the bandwith command

and again another problem

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy  output wirless

% policy map wirless not configured

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy  output wireless

fair-queue command is not supported in output direction for this interface

Configuration failed on GigabitEthernet1/9

Gateway2(config-if)#

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4

my ios is

"sup-bootdisk:c7600s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.152-1.S.bin"

my router is 7640

im wondering if my router accept QOS ??????/

regards

the config is so simple

class-map match-all wireless

match access-group name wireless

!        

policy-map wireless

class wireless

class class-default

  fair-queue

!        

ip access-list extended wireless

permit ip xx.xx.66.128 0.0.0.127 any

regards

Yes,

i think that you need to take away fair-queue and to leave the default FIFO on class-default.

Alessio

it accepted it after removing fair queue

but now , im wondering ,

i removed fair queue and bandwith commands , and asking if the qos has  benefit ????

i mean  wt should i do to gurantee 15 mega bw for the acceslist wireless ??????

regrads

hi , i  made another policaymap and the same issue appeared !!!

here is new config

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

!        

class-map match-all AlessioAndreoli

match access-group name wireless

!        

policy-map AlessioAndreoli

class AlessioAndreoli

  bandwidth 15000

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

and here is the output :

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy output AlessioAndreoli

bandwidth command is not supported in output direction for this interface

Configuration failed on GigabitEthernet1/9

Gateway2(config-if)#service-policy input  AlessioAndreoli

bandwidth command is not supported in input direction for this interface

Configuration failed on GigabitEthernet1/9

Gateway2(config-if)#

as you see, it cant be applied niether in nor out

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

hi ,

assume im not expert in policying and qos and that what i am.

i just want to gurentee 15  meg for  the access-list users , and dont want them to exceed any  more bandwih

my goal is to "" Gurantee bw , Dont allow exceed this bw""""

now ,

forget qos and policying

now wt i need to do in config  to achive my goal ??

could u give me a breif config of wt i need .

regards

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card