11-10-2012 06:05 AM - edited 03-07-2019 09:58 AM
I have a Cisco 2921 and a 3750 stack. I want to use both interfaces on the 2921 to connect to the 3750 stack switch 1 and 2. Is this possible using same ip subnet?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-10-2012 06:25 AM
Hi,
Understanding Layer 3 EtherChannel Support on the Cisco ISR
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/prod_white_paper0900aecd806f698a.pdf
Please rate helpful posts.
11-10-2012 06:55 AM
Hi,
You can configure Etherchannel to bundle the ports.
It is possible to create a port-channel on 2921 to bundle the interfaces on motherboard, here are few points which should be considered :
1. Negotiation protocols like PAgP and LACP are not supported on onboard ports. You have to set it up manually with "mode ON"
2. Etherchannel could not be formed with the mix of On board Gig, ES3/2 or HWIC ports in ISR G2
For the Other End if you are using a Stack Switch, it is possible to bundle the ports cross stack. You could check the following URL’s :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_example09186a00806cb982.shtml
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1901
Following is the sample configuration example which tested few days back for one of my customers on 2911 which is also an ISRG2 router and 3560 switch and was able to ping end to end from both the devices.
<2911>
BGL.I.01-2900-1#sh run int po1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 68 bytes
!
interface Port-channel1
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
end
BGL.I.01-2900-1#sh run int gi0/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 93 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
channel-group 1
end
<3560>
BGL.I.08-3500-6#sh run int po1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 83 bytes
!
interface Port-channel1
no switchport
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
end
BGL.I.08-3500-6#sh run int fa0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 88 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no switchport
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode on
end
<>
Also on Router/Multilayer SW's an ip from the same subnet cannot be assigned on the multiple interfaces, so if you need to have redundant connections - then etherchannel is the best option.
- HTH
Rahul
11-10-2012 06:25 AM
Hi,
Understanding Layer 3 EtherChannel Support on the Cisco ISR
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/prod_white_paper0900aecd806f698a.pdf
Please rate helpful posts.
04-10-2018 01:00 AM
11-10-2012 06:55 AM
Hi,
You can configure Etherchannel to bundle the ports.
It is possible to create a port-channel on 2921 to bundle the interfaces on motherboard, here are few points which should be considered :
1. Negotiation protocols like PAgP and LACP are not supported on onboard ports. You have to set it up manually with "mode ON"
2. Etherchannel could not be formed with the mix of On board Gig, ES3/2 or HWIC ports in ISR G2
For the Other End if you are using a Stack Switch, it is possible to bundle the ports cross stack. You could check the following URL’s :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_example09186a00806cb982.shtml
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1901
Following is the sample configuration example which tested few days back for one of my customers on 2911 which is also an ISRG2 router and 3560 switch and was able to ping end to end from both the devices.
<2911>
BGL.I.01-2900-1#sh run int po1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 68 bytes
!
interface Port-channel1
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
end
BGL.I.01-2900-1#sh run int gi0/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 93 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
channel-group 1
end
<3560>
BGL.I.08-3500-6#sh run int po1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 83 bytes
!
interface Port-channel1
no switchport
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
end
BGL.I.08-3500-6#sh run int fa0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 88 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
no switchport
no ip address
channel-group 1 mode on
end
<>
Also on Router/Multilayer SW's an ip from the same subnet cannot be assigned on the multiple interfaces, so if you need to have redundant connections - then etherchannel is the best option.
- HTH
Rahul
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide