cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1915
Views
10
Helpful
8
Replies

Setup trunking between 3750/2960 and RV325

Marc Angelo
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

 

I'm trying to get trunking working between (either) a 3750 or 2960G and a RV325.

Current status

3750 and 2960G are linked using fibre trunk ports

3750 is VTP (version2) server 2960G is client

3750 operates 4 VLans

 

Objective:

Leverage the RV325 Firewall, SPI, DDOS and DMZ features

Provide internet gateway for the VLans in the 3750/2960 setup

 

Problems:

I cannot see how to set the RV325 as a vtp client - I think that I can't

In that case how to I configure either the 3750/2960G to trunk and route to and from the RV325

 

I have tried replicating (mirroring) the Vlans on the RV325 but ICMP timesout. At the moment the RV325 firewall is disabled.

 

Thanks in advance

P

2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

MPA

 

I have looked through the adjusted config that you posted and do not see any obvious issues in it. Based on what I see I would expect inter vlan routing to be working. As I thought about your issue my first concern was to verify that ip routing was still enabled. And I see that it is. So we must look for other causes. Here are a few things that I observe:

You have DHCP scopes for 2 vlans.

You have 3 vlans configured and at least one port assigned to each vlan.

The DHCP scopes correspond to vlans 1 and 2.

How are hosts in vlan 3 getting IP addresses? What is their default gateway?

 

To further investigate this would you post the output of these commands on the switch

show interface status

show ip route

show ip interface brief

show arp

 

HTH

 

Rick 

HTH

Rick

View solution in original post

MPA

 

I am glad to know that you got it working and that my suggestions pointed you in the right direction. Thank you for marking this question as solved. This will help other participants in the forum to identify discussions that have helpful information. These forums are excellent places to ask questions and to learn about networking. I hope to see you continue to be active in the forum.

 

HTH

 

Rick

HTH

Rick

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8

Richard Burts
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

I do not have much experience with the RV325 and can not address whether it supports VTP or trunking to the switch. But I can suggest an approach that might allow the RV325 functionality that you want.

 

Before I make my suggestion there is a question that I must ask. Does the 3750 have IP routing enabled and does the 3750 provide inter vlan routing? That would seem logical based on the information provided so far. If that is not the case then please explain where and how inter vlan routing is provided.

 

My suggestion is to create a new vlan on the 3750 (do not need this vlan on 2960). Assign a port on 3750 to this vlan and connect this port to the RV325. Configure a vlan interface on the 3750 and assign an IP address and mask for this interface. Configure the RV325 with an IP address in the subnet used on the 3750. Configure a default route on the 3750 with the RV325 as the next hop. Configure routes on the RV352 for the subnets of the other vlans on the switches. Configure the RV325 for the features that you want to use (remembering that you will need the RV325 to provide address translation for all subnets from the switches that are to have internet access).

 

HTH

 

Rick

HTH

Rick

Haha!

 

Something that seemingly was working is now not working... No inter vlan ip routing is not working:

 

Here is the redacted/obfuscated config:

!
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
service unsupported-transceiver
!
hostname XXXXXXXXXXXXX
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
username XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
!
no aaa new-model
switch 1 provision ws-c3750-48ts
system mtu routing 1500
ip routing
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.1.1 10.10.1.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.2.1 10.10.2.99
!
ip dhcp pool v1
network 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0
domain-name v1.XXXXXXXXXXXXX
dns-server 192.168.1.254
default-router 10.10.1.1
lease 30
!
ip dhcp pool v2
network 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0
domain-name v2.XXXXXXXXXXXXX
dns-server 192.168.1.254
default-router 10.10.2.1
lease 30
!
crypto pki trustpoint XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

!
crypto pki certificate chain XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
quit
!
no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending

!

interface FastEthernet1/0/12
switchport access vlan 2
switchport mode access
duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/25
switchport access vlan 3
switchport mode access
duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/47
switchport mode access
duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/48
switchport mode access
duplex full
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/3
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan3
ip address 10.10.3.1 255.255.255.0
!

ip default-gateway XXXXXXXXXXXXX
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 XXXXXXXXXXXXX
ip http server
ip http secure-server
!
!
!
!
line con 0
line vty 0 4
privilege level 15
login local
transport input ssh
line vty 5 15
login
!
end

 

Ignoring the config issue to the RV325 for the moment, what have I done wrong her with inter vlan routing? After that I can tackle the RV325 setup... 

Thanks in advance,

MPA

 

 

 

MPA

 

I have looked through the adjusted config that you posted and do not see any obvious issues in it. Based on what I see I would expect inter vlan routing to be working. As I thought about your issue my first concern was to verify that ip routing was still enabled. And I see that it is. So we must look for other causes. Here are a few things that I observe:

You have DHCP scopes for 2 vlans.

You have 3 vlans configured and at least one port assigned to each vlan.

The DHCP scopes correspond to vlans 1 and 2.

How are hosts in vlan 3 getting IP addresses? What is their default gateway?

 

To further investigate this would you post the output of these commands on the switch

show interface status

show ip route

show ip interface brief

show arp

 

HTH

 

Rick 

HTH

Rick

Hi Rick,

 

Thanks for your response

Here's the answers to your questions...

Having poked about - inter vlan routing IS working except only on the VTP server (3750) I moved the two hosts from the 2950 to the 3750 and they can now ping each other - so we have an issue over the trunk perhaps?

 

Vlan3 are all servers manually configured with static IPs, gateways etc. - I'd be interested in any comments you have about this? Not best practice perhaps?

I also created Vlan100 for management, and Vlan99 for the RV325/gateway but please "ignore" for the moment...

 

My plan was to get Vlan1 and  Vlan3 working using a RV325 gateway - then do the other Vlans and ACL config after.

sh int status (redacted):
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type
Fa1/0/9 notconnect 2 full auto 10/100BaseTX
Fa1/0/32 connected 3 full a-100 10/100BaseTX
Fa1/0/41 connected 1 full a-100 10/100BaseTX
Fa1/0/42 notconnect 1 full auto 10/100BaseTX
Fa1/0/43 connected 1 full a-100 10/100BaseTX
Fa1/0/44 notconnect 1 full auto 10/100BaseTX
Gi1/0/1 err-disabled 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi1/0/2 notconnect 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi1/0/3 notconnect 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi1/0/4 connected trunk a-full a-1000 unsupported

 

sh ip route:

 

Gateway of last resort is 10.10.99.2 to network 0.0.0.0

10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
C 10.10.1.0 is directly connected, Vlan1
C 10.10.2.0 is directly connected, Vlan2
C 10.10.3.0 is directly connected, Vlan3
C 10.10.99.0 is directly connected, Vlan99
C 10.10.100.0 is directly connected, Vlan100
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.10.99.2

 

sh int brief (redacted):

 

Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Vlan1 10.10.1.1 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan2 10.10.2.1 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan3 10.10.3.1 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan99 10.10.99.1 YES NVRAM up up
Vlan100 10.10.100.1 YES NVRAM up up
FastEthernet1/0/9 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/32 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet1/0/33 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/41 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet1/0/42 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/43 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet1/0/44 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/45 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/46 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/47 unassigned YES unset down down
FastEthernet1/0/48 unassigned YES unset down down
GigabitEthernet1/0/1 unassigned YES unset down down
GigabitEthernet1/0/2 unassigned YES unset down down
GigabitEthernet1/0/3 unassigned YES unset down down
GigabitEthernet1/0/4 unassigned YES unset up up
 

sh arp:

Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 10.10.1.1 - 001a.e36c.ac40 ARPA Vlan1
Internet 10.10.3.1 - 001a.e36c.ac42 ARPA Vlan3
Internet 10.10.2.1 - 001a.e36c.ac41 ARPA Vlan2
Internet 10.10.1.5 10 5065.f357.bbfe ARPA Vlan1
Internet 10.10.99.1 - 001a.e36c.ac48 ARPA Vlan99
Internet 10.10.1.100 0 0050.b67e.4668 ARPA Vlan1
Internet 10.10.100.1 - 001a.e36c.ac49 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.10.100.2 99 0022.0d9b.0542 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.10.3.150 12 b827.eb25.49ac ARPA Vlan3

 

the 2960 responds to the address 10.10.100.2

thanks again

 

MPA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Rick,

 

I think that I've done this wrong...

 

interface FastEthernet1/0/3
no switchport
ip address 10.10.98.1 255.255.255.0
duplex full

[...]

ip default-gateway 10.10.98.3
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.98.3

 

Is this what you meant?

or did you mean something like this:

 

interface FastEthernet1/0/3
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk

 [...]

interface Vlan98
ip address 10.10.98.1 255.255.255.0

[...]

ip default-gateway 10.10.98.3
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.98.3

 

?

Thanks again

MPA

MPA

 

I have been on travel and am trying to catch up. Far a while there was concern about inter vlan routing. I believe that this is resolved. Is that correct?  A couple of posts ago there was mention of possible issues with the trunk to 2960. Is that resolved?

 

In this most recent post what you have done with FastE1/0/3 accomplishes what I was suggesting for routing between the 3750 and the RV325. It is a bit different from what I suggested, but in fact it is probably a bit better than what I suggested. So keep that. The alternative of making it a trunk interface is not what I was suggesting and I do not believe that you want to use that alternative.

 

HTH

 

Rick

HTH

Rick

Hi Rick,

The solution is slightly different than that you suggested but your replies helped reach the answer by a process of elimination...

1) You identified that the config I made should route inter-vlan. It does with that configuration. There was a different issue on one of the test hosts you could not have seen. Your question "How are hosts in vlan 3 getting IP addresses? What is their default gateway?" lead me to the mis-config of one of the hosts...

2) Your suggestion re connecting the RV325/3750, while probably correct, was based upon the premise that the RV325 doesn't use VTP... well it doesn't understand VTP but you can configure vlans on it... so as long as

a) the RV325 VLANS use the same ID number (and the same corresponding subnet config) as those defined on the 3750

b) the port on the RV325 selected for trunking is enabled for those VLANS and they are set to "Tagged" so vlan traffic is tagged on the trunk

c) the trunk port (to RV325) on the 3750 is configure as you would any other trunk 

 

then traffic will route between all hosts and vlans to and from the RV325 and 3750.

 

Thanks very much for your help.

 

Best,

 

MPA

 

MPA

 

I am glad to know that you got it working and that my suggestions pointed you in the right direction. Thank you for marking this question as solved. This will help other participants in the forum to identify discussions that have helpful information. These forums are excellent places to ask questions and to learn about networking. I hope to see you continue to be active in the forum.

 

HTH

 

Rick

HTH

Rick
Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card