12-07-2012 02:39 AM - edited 03-07-2019 10:26 AM
Hi All,
I have two Cisco 2960S (switch 1 & 2 in figure) connected in stack with proper stack cable.
Referring to the picture, connecting switch 3 with two optical cables one per 2960s switch will results in loop or i will provide redundancy to switch 3?
Thankyou in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-07-2012 03:03 AM
Hi,
"A switch stack appears as a single spanning-tree node to the rest of the network, and all stack members use the same bridge ID for a given spanning tree. The bridge ID is derived from the MAC address of the stack master. "
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-07-2012 02:44 AM
Sorry,
i forgot to say that all switches are running PVST.
Thankyou!
12-07-2012 03:03 AM
Hi,
"A switch stack appears as a single spanning-tree node to the rest of the network, and all stack members use the same bridge ID for a given spanning tree. The bridge ID is derived from the MAC address of the stack master. "
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-07-2012 03:15 AM
Hi,
Thankyou for reply, so i thin it's correct to say i'll create a loop.
It's possible to aggregate the two links between Stack switches and switch number 3 in a 2Gb PortChannel? This ensures me redundancy to switch number 3?
Thankyou
12-07-2012 04:00 AM
Hi,
If the stack appears as a single node for STP then it is safe to assume you'll be in the same situation as having 2 single switches connected together and so STP will take care of this and block one link, at least that's my understanding.
Regards.
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.
12-07-2012 04:35 AM
Ok,
now i understood!!
Thankyou so much
Regards
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide