cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Announcements

504
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
Highlighted
Beginner

Unequal cost path EIGRP, 3560

We have 2-3560g (running L3) trunked through a 100Mb MetroEthernet at 2 different location. Recently added a second 5mb MetroE from another ISP for redundancy. Confiugred both 3560g with EIGRP variance 2 and confirmed that the 5Mb MetroE is passing packet.

As soon as I enable the port for the 5mb ME trunk, CPU utilization on both 3560g spiked up to almost 100%. random packet drop start to occur.

During high CPU Utilization:

CPU utilization for five seconds: 88%/19%; one minute: 48%; five minutes: 17%

PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process

7 18920821 36754214 514 14.69% 6.05% 1.71% 0 ARP Input

43 6365330 688506172 9 1.43% 0.59% 0.21% 0 Fifo Error Detec

55 451743 382972158 1 1.27% 0.58% 0.16% 0 HLFM address lea

157 11620124 53823977 215 14.21% 11.01% 3.17% 0 IP Input

160 18305747 102111026 179 0.31% 0.31% 0.20% 0 Spanning Tree

219 1963017 14945584 131 6.54% 5.22% 1.51% 0 IP-EIGRP(0): PDM

230 1185833 33942693 34 1.75% 1.80% 0.53% 0 IP-EIGRP(0): HEL

I appreciate any help you can provide.

THX

1 REPLY 1
Beginner

The second 5mb ME ISP is

The second 5mb ME ISP is using vlan#, that is not the same vlan# used in the 3560g. Once ISP configured their device without vlan tagging and just allowed traffic through problem went away.

CreatePlease to create content
Content for Community-Ad
July's Community Spotlight Awards